* * Our SDP  Database  for 46 years now available on interactive CD-ROM  * *                                            * * Our NAS  Database  for 52 years now available on interactive CD-ROM  * *                                      * * Our ASI  Database  for 25 years now available on interactive CD-ROM  * *

Current Economic Statistics and Review For the Week 
Ended
June 06, 2009 (23rd Weekly Report of 2009)

 

Foreign Direct Investment in India – The Recent Beginning of a Rising Phase

 

Introduction

            With a paradigm shift in economic management after the reforms began in the early 1990s, there was a metamorphic change in the perception of policy planners regarding the role of external trade and investment as well as the system of exchange rate and payments.  It was believed, contrary to the past, that a liberalised foreign trade, payments and investment system opens up a window on the world through which vast types of benefits would flow: exposure to new products, new processes, advanced technology, modern marketing and finance, employees’ skill upgradation and application of modern management techniques. The experiences of many high-performing Asian economies were held out as examples of success stories of deriving such benefits of exposure to global trade and investment [which were achieved along with, of course, those countries’ intensive focus on social sector development as well as higher levels of domestic savings and investment; many of them also have had land reforms which helped to widen their domestic markets]. 

            Drawing lessons from such experiences and also as part of the broader strategy of liberalisation and globalisation, this country too moved fast in opening up the external sector.  It was also perceived that apart from supplementing domestic savings, non-debt capital flows could provide a measure of long-term sustainability to the country’s balance of payments.  Therefore, the strategy adopted was one of shifting the weight of external sector financing from borrowing to direct equity investment inflow (and also changing the composition of commercial borrowing from sizeable short-term and government-guaranteed debt to long-term debt with minimum reliance on government guarantees).

            Subsequent to the initial initiation of reforms, liberalisation of regulations regarding foreign investment has passed through several stages.  The basic approach adopted has been one of steady but gradual relaxation of regulations. To begin with, in August 1991, dispensing with the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) 1964, a system of permitting automatic approval for foreign investment up to 51% equity in 35 industries was introduced.  For industries not covered by automatic approval, a Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) was set up in the government to process the applications. There were further relaxations from time to time, but the second major step taken was in January 1997 when, for the first time, detailed guidelines for the FIPB were issued and the list of industries eligible for automatic approval was expanded to cover 48 of general category allowing equity up to 51%, 3 industries relating to mining for automatic approval up to 50% of foreign equity and another set of 9 industries eligible for 74% foreign equity. Various procedural changes effected during 1997 were also of a substantive nature designed to give a push to foreign direct investment.

Finally, as a result of the comprehensive review of the FDI policy, wide-ranging policy changes were notified in 2006; these included extending the scope of automatic route, increasing equity caps, removing restrictions, simplifying procedures and extending the horizon of FDI to vistas like single brand product retailing and agriculture. Of late, several steps have been initiated to facilitate FDI inflows which, among other things, include: raising the equity cap in civil aviation; organizing Destination India events in association with CII and FICCI with a view to attracting investments; activating the Foreign Investment Implementation Authority (FIIA)  towards speedy resolution of investment-related problems; setting up of National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council (NMCC) to provide a continuing forum for policy dialogue to energise the growth of manufacturing; regular interactions with foreign investors through bilateral/regional/international meets and meetings with individual investors; and making the website of the Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion  (www.dipp.nic.in) more user-friendly with online chat facility. The government has indicated that about 4,500 investment-related queries have been replied during just one year 2007-08 (Economic Survey 2007-08, pp.202-03).

Thus, with increased liberalisation, equity caps on FDI now exist only in a few limited sectors which are regulated  on security or other special considerations. These are: FM radio broadcasting (up to 20 per cent); insurance, defence production, petroleum refining in the PSUs, print and electronic media covering news and current affairs (up to 26 per cent); air transport services, asset reconstruction companies, cable network, direct to home (DTH), hardware for uplinking, HUB, etc. (up to 49 per cent); single brand retailing (up to 51 per cent); atomic minerals, private sector banking, telecom services, establishment and operation of satellites (up to 74 per cent). FDI is prohibited in retail trading (except for single brand product retailing), gambling and betting, lottery and atomic energy. Approval for proposals for induction of equity of more than 24 per cent for manufacture of items that are reserved for small-scale sector and the proposals where the foreign investor has an existing joint venture/technical collaboration/trademark agreement in the same field of activity and where the provisions are not under automatic route (Economic Survey 2006-07, p.154).

FDI Flows Did Not Yield Results on Expected Lines Initially

            When external sector liberalisation was thus conceived and implemented, there was a distinct expectation, as hinted at earlier, that there would be greater flow of FDI as compared with portfolio flows.  There were concerted efforts towards that end, but they did not yield the desired results for quite some years.  No doubt, an environment of substantial openness got created in the economy.  A large number of foreign collaboration approvals was accorded in the initial years themselves.  For instance, between August 1991 and 1994, the Government had approved 5,778 foreign collaboration proposals including 2,806 foreign equity proposals amounting to Rs 22,238 crore.  Earlier, for 15 years there were very few such approvals under the FERA.  As a consequent to the amendments to the FERA and the liberalisation of foreign investment policy, many multinational companies (MNCs) could increase their equity holdings beyond 51%.  Many companies like Coca Cola and IBM, which had exited from the Indian market in the 1970s, returned to the country.  Later on, by the end of September 2004, the number of fresh foreign collaborations approved since liberalization had increased by nearly 12,000.

 

 

 Table 1: Foreign Investment Flows By Different Categories

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1992-93

1993-94

1994-95

1995-96

1996-97

1997-98

1998-99

1999-00

A

 

Direct Investment

315

586

1314

2144

2821

3557

2462

2155

 

a

RBI automatic route

42

89

171

169

135

202

179

171

 

b

SIA/FIPb route

222

280

701

1249

1922

2754

1821

1410

 

c

NRI

51

217

442

715

639

241

62

84

 

d

Acquisition of shares $

 

 

 

11

125

380

4000

490

B

 

Portfolio Investment

244

3567

3824

2748

3312

1828

-61

3026

 

a

FIIS #

1

1665

1503

2009

1926

979

-390

2135

 

b

Euro Equities &

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ADRs/GDRs @

240

1520

2082

683

1366

645

270

768

 

c

Offshore funds & others

3

382

239

56

20

204

59

123

 

 

Total (A+B)

559

4153

5138

4892

6133

5385

2401

5181

C

 

Growth Scenario

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a

Real GDP growth (%)

5.4

5.7

6.4

7.3

8

4.3

6.7

6.4

 

b

Manufacturing GDP growth (%)

3.1

8.6

10.8

15.5

9.5

0.1

3.1

3.2

*Provisional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$ Relates to acqusition of shares of Indian companies by non-residents under section 29 of Fera

 

 

# Represents fresh inflow/ outflow of funds by FIIs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 @. Fiqures include GDRs/ADRs amounts raised abroad by indian corporates

 

 

 

 

Source :Government of India : Economic Survey 2000-2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

            Even so, the FDI in terms of the amounts of annual flows remained meagre in the range of less than $1 billion or thereabout per year until 1994-95 and between $2 to $4 billion per year thereafter for 15 years until 2004-05 (Tables 1 and 2).  This happened because the amounts of FDI involved in individual collaboration and other approvals were meagre, many of them giving the impression of attempts being made to formally enter the Indian market and not for immediate execution of investment projects.  The meagre nature of this FDI flow stands out when we compare them with two other indicators.  First, the portfolio inflows into India , had overtaken the FDI inflows in the initial years of reforms themselves.  For instance, FDI inflow in 1993-94 was $586 million, but portfolio inflows had totalled $3,567 million; investments by foreign institutional investors (FIIs) alone were $1,665 million in the year.  In the next year 1994-95, FDI totalled $1,314 million, whereas portfolio investments aggregated $3,824 million (Table 1).

                                                                        Table 2:  FDI  by Host Region                                                

 

 

 

 

 

 

(US $ million )

 

 

Country

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999*

China

11156

27515

33787

35849

40180

44236

43751

40400

India

233

550

973

2144

2426

3577

2635

2168

Indonesia

1777

2004

210

4346

6194

4677

-356

-3270

Korea   Rep. Of

727

588

991

1357

2308

3088

5215

10340

Malaysia

5183

5006

4581

5816

7296

6513

2700

3532

Philippines

228

1238

1591

1459

1520

1249

1752

737

Thailand

2114

1805

1343

2000

2405

3732

7449

6078

All  Developing Countries

51108

78813

104920

111884

145030

178789

179481

207619

(including China )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share of India in Developing Countries

0.5

0.7

0.9

1.9

1.7

2.0

1.5

1

* estimates

Note: Figures for India in this Table may not be comparable with those in other tables because of differences in coverage and

source of information.

Source :World Investment Report ,United Nations 2000 (Cited in Economic Survey 2000-01)

Second, the FDI inflow into India appeared unusually miniscule when compared with the inflows in favour of China and also many south-east Asian economies (Graph A). As we would explain shortly, China ’s is a special case containing many peculiar features.  Even so, there is no  gainsaying that China ’s achievements on the FDI front has been phenomenal.  Even some of the other countries like Korea , Malaysia , Indonesia and Thailand , have experienced much bigger amounts of FDI inflows than that of India (Table 2).  India ’s FDI share never crossed 2% of the total FDI inflows of all developing countries.  China and the east-Asian countries did experience a slight setback after the Asian crisis of 1997 but it was short-lived.  FDI inflow into East Asia recovered from $70 billion in 1999 to $105 billion in 2004 and $157 billion in 2007 (Table 3). In the comparable period, the Chinese FDI steadily increased from $40 billion to $60.6 billion and finally to $83.5 billion.  An interesting story forming part of this global FDI flow is the sudden steep increase in such flow into the Indian economy after 2005. Incidentally, as explained below, the data for India and China are not strictly comparable.

Table 3: Regional FDI Inflows

(In Billion US $ )

 

 

 

 

Year

East Asia

India

China

 

 

 

 

1995

48

2.14

35.85

1996

52

2.77

40.8

1997

60

3.62

45.3

1998

62

3.08

45.46

1999

70

2.44

40.32

2000

118

2.91

40.72

2001

70

4.22

46.88

2002

58

3.13

52.74

2003

60

2.63

53.51

2004

105

3.76

60.63

2005

116

5.55

72.41

2006

132

15.73

72.72

2007

157

24.58

83.52

2008

 

27.31

 

 

 

 

 

Source : UNCTAD:World Development Reports

Quantum Leap in FDI Since 2005-06

            It is this development of a sudden surge in India ’s FDI inflow that deserves to be noted with some satisfaction and it also calls for some explanation.  As shown in Table 4, the country’s FDI inflow has risen from $3.78 billion in 2004-05 to $5.55 billion in 2005-06 and galloped thereafter to $24.58 billion in 2007-08 and to $27.31 billion in 2008-09.  It is found that for the first time since the reforms began that the FDI inflows in the form of direct equity (i.e., excluding reinvested earnings of FDI companies operating in India) have overtaken the portfolio inflows of FIIs in 2006-07 and continued to be so in 2007-08, while in 2008-09, there has been a steep disinvestment by FIIs but FDI flows have continued to expand (Table 4).

            A few global and domestic factors have contributed to the expansion in India ’s FDI flow in recent years.  As UNCTAD’s annual investment review of 2008 has reported, contributing to this robust growth of FDI inflows are significant numbers of cross-border mergers  and acquisitions (M&As) and general improvements in investment environment; these improvements included further liberalisation of FDI, better economic integration, resilient economic growth and strong industrial investment and growth.

Table 4: Foreign Investment Inflows

(US $ million)

Item

1995-96

1996-97

1997-98

1998-99

1999-00

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08(P)

2008-09(P)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

A.

Direct Investment   

2,144

2,821

3,557

2,462

2,155

4,029

6,130

5,035

4,322

6,051

8,961

22,826

34,362

33,613

 

 (I+II+III)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I.   Equity

2,144

2,821

3,557

2,462

2,155

2,400

4,095

2,764

2,229

3,778

5,975

16,481

26,867

27,807

 

(a+b+c+d+e)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a. Government  (SIA/FIPB)

1,249

1,922

2,754

1,821

1,410

1,456

2,221

919

928

1,062

1,126

2,156

2,298

4,677

 

b. RBI

169

135

202

179

171

454

767

739

534

1,258

2,233

7,151

17,129

17,998

 

c. NRI

715

639

241

62

84

67

35

 

d. Acquisition of shares *

11

125

360

400

490

362

881

916

735

930

2,181

6,278

5,148

4,632

 

e. Equity capital of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

unincorporated bodies #

..

..

..

..

..

61

191

190

32

528

435

896

2,292

500

 

II. Reinvested earnings +

..

..

..

..

..

1,350

1,645

1,833

1,460

1,904

2,760

5,828

7,168

4,725

 

III. Other capital ++

. .

. .

. .

. .

. .

279

390

438

633

369

226

517

327

1,081

B.

Portfolio Investment

2,748

3,312

1,828

-61

3,026

2,760

2,021

979

11,377

9,315

12,492

7,003

29,395

-13,855

 

(a+b+c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a. GDRs/ADRs # #

683

1,366

645

270

768

831

477

600

459

613

2,552

3,776

8,769

1,162

 

b. FIIs **

2,009

1,926

979

-390

2,135

1,847

1,505

377

10,918

8,686

9,926

3,225

20,328

-15,017

 

c. Offshore funds and others

56

20

204

59

123

82

39

2

16

14

2

298

Total (A+B)

4,892

6,133

5,385

2,401

5,181

6,789

8,151

6,014

15,699

15,366

21,453

29,829

63,757

19,758

Source: RBI (2009): RBI Bulletin, May

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

            In India ’s case, all of these factors seem to have played a role. The most significant, as brought out in Table 5, has been the economy’s growth momentum which picked up after 2003-04 or thereabout and continued until 2007-08. More noteworthy aspect of the growth climate has been the historically high levels of domestic saving and investment rates attained during the period. The increases of saving rate from 26.3% in 2002-03 to 37.7% in 2007-08 and investment rate from 25.2% to 39.1% during the same period, have been truly unprecedented.  They do reflect the overall improvement in the economic climate which has contributed to a better attraction of FDI into the country

 

Table 5: India 's FDI Inflows and the Growth Scenario

Year

Amount of FDI

Growth Indicators

 

Inflows *

 

 

 

 

In Rupees, Crore

In US $ Million

Real GDP

Domestic Saving Rate

Investment Rate

 

 

 

 Growth (%)

(%)

(%)

1991-2000

60,604

16698

 

 

 

(August 1991-March 2000)

 

 

 

 

 

2000-01

12646

2908

4.4

23.7

24.3

2001-02

19361

4222

5.8

23.5

22.8

2002-03

14932

3134

3.8

26.3

25.2

2003-04

12117

2634

8.5

29.8

27.6

2004-05

17138

3759

7.5

31.7

32.1

2005-06

24613

5546

9.5

34.2

35.5

2006-07

70630

15726

9.7

35.7

36.9

2007-08

98664

24579

9

37.7

39.1

2008-09

122919

27309

6.7

-

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Including Advance Figures and do not cover re-invested earnings.

 

 

Source:www.dipp.nic.in and CSO: National Accounts Statistic(NAS)

 

 

In addition, reports suggest that some significant rationalisation and simplification of government procedures have taken place in recent years.  Secondly, the interest shown by some state governments in attracting investments in their respective states is indeed noteworthy.  They have shown competitive spirit including providing fiscal concessions for investment projects. In this respect, the dynamic spirits shown by Karnataka, Tami Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat stand out.  Next to Delhi and Maharashtra , they have attracted  the maximum amounts of FDI in that order.  Finally, it is found that there has occurred substantial transformation in the spirit of competitiveness and enterprise amongst the Indian businessmen in recent years, particularly after the 1990s, which is reflected in large numbers of mergers and acquisitions and technological tie-ups. 

Table 6: Foreign  Direct  Investment  Flows  (FDI)

(Millions of Dollars and Percentage)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As  Percentage of GrossFixed Capital Formation (GFCF)

FDI flows

1999-2000

2004

2005

2006

2007

1990-2000

2005

2006

2007

 

 

(Annual average)

 

 

 

 

(Annual average)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

India

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inward

1705

5771

7606

19662

22950

1.8

3

6.6

5.8

 

Outward

121

2179

2978

12842

13649

 

1.2

4.3

3.5

China

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inward

30104

60630

72406

72715

83521

11

7.7

6.4

5.9

 

Outward

2195

5498

12261

21160

22469

1

1.3

1.9

1.6

United States

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inward

109513

135826

104773

236701

232839

7

4.3

9.1

9

 

Outward

92010

294905

15369

221664

313787

6.3

0.6

8.5

12.1

East Asia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inward

48834

106331

116177

131879

156706

8.8

9

8.7

8.6

 

Outward

29472

62924

49836

82301

102865

5.5

3.9

5.4

5.7

World

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inward

492605

717695

958697

1411018

1833324

7.7

9.7

12.9

14.8

 

Outward

492535

920151

880808

1323150

1996514

7.9

9

12.2

16.2

Source: UNCTAD (2009): World Investment Report 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

            Also, as cited earlier, the recent period has such renewed intensity of cross-border capital flows and India has benefited from that phenomenon.  But, it is found that for once, India ’s  rate  of expansion in FDI flows or even the absolute increases in such FDI has been higher than that of China .  India added about $10 billion each in 2006 and 2007 to its flow of FDI, but China added a little above $10 billion in these two years together (Table 6). As a result, India ’s inward FDI flow as percentage of the country’s gross fixed capital formation has touched the corresponding ratio now obtaining for China (Table 6).  In 2005, the ratio for India was 3.0% but it increased to 6.6% in 2006 and 5.8% in 2007.  China ’s, on the other hand, was far ahead at 7.7% in 2005 but fell thereafter to 6.4% and 5.9% in the subsequent two years, respectively.  Even the stock of FDI as percentage of GDP has almost doubled from 3.7% in 2000 to 5.7% in 2006 and 6.7% in 2007 in the case of India .   In the case of China, on the other hand, because of continuously high rates of economic growth followed by the reduced pace of FDI flow, the corresponding ratio has dipped from 16.2 to 10.5% and 10.1% during the above period (Table 7).

Table 7: Foreign  Direct  Investment  Stocks   (FDI)

(Millions of Dollars and Percentage)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As a Percentage of Gross domestic Product(GDP)

FDI Stocks

1990

1995

2000

2006

2007

1990

2000

2006

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

India

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inward

1657

5641

17517

52369

76226

0.5

3.7

5.7

6.7

 

Outward

124

495

1859

15900

29412

 

0.4

1.7

2.6

China

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inward

20691

101098

193348

292559

327087

5.1

16.2

10.5

10.1

 

Outward

4455

17768

27768

73330

95799

1.1

2.3

2.6

3

United States

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inward

394911

535553

1256867

1843885

2093049

6.8

12.8

14

15.1

 

Outward

430521

699015

1316247

2454674

2791269

7.4

13.4

18.6

20.2

East Asia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inward

240645

357419

710475

1213092

1691138

25.9

32.1

28.6

35

 

Outward

49032

149444

509637

927658

1348860

5.4

23.2

21.9

28

World

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inward

1941252

2914356

5786700

12470085

15210560

9.1

18.1

25.5

27.9

 

Outward

1785267

2941198

6148211

12756149

15602339

8.5

19.4

26.3

28.9

Source: UNCTAD (2009): World Investment Report 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

            While on the subject of comparing China ’s track record in attracting FDI with that of India , the literature has repeatedly emphasized the importance of adding a caveat (see Bajpai and Dasgupta 2004).  It must be admitted at once that despite these caveats, it cannot be denied that China ’s achievement has been far superior to that of India .

            Coming to the caveats referred to above, the following observations made by Bajpai and Dasgupta (2004) based on an IFC study on “FDI - India and China - A Comparison” had summed up the issues fairly comprehensively:

“As a rough approximation, we make the necessary adjustments in China 's FDI statistics, that is, by excluding data under several heads that China includes in its FDI, but do not strictly fall under the purview of FDI. These heads include: the round-tripping of funds from Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macao into mainland China; inter-company debt transactions; short and long-term loans; financial leasing; trade credits; grants; bonds; non-cash acquisition of equity (tangible and intangible components such as technology fee, brand name, etc.); investment made by foreign venture capital investors; earnings data of indirectly-held FDI enterprises; control premium; non-competition fee; and imported equipment. Having excluded data under these heads, net FDI inflows into China reduce from roughly $40.7 billion to $20.3 billion in 2000.

“On the other hand, India's adoption of a somewhat broader method of FDI computation would raise its net annual FDI inflow figures, as reported in the Reserve Bank of India's official balance of payment statistics, from around $3.2 billion to about $8.1 billion in 2000”.

India has since already adopted the international standards in defining FDI including covering reinvested earnings, though for a critical study of FDI flows actual cash flows are relevant, and this is what has been done above.

In Conclusion

            The literature on Indian FDI has raised a number of issues which gave an explanation for the relatively lower size of inflows.  Apart from the conventional arguments of antiquated labour laws and bureaucratic restraints, foreign investors seem to have focused essentially on domestic market and not for treating India as an export base.  In this respect, the foreign investors have found India ’s vast entrepreneurial base fairly competitive.  As it is, India has a reasonably good industrial base.  Because of the same logic of the size of the domestic market, foreign investors have found information and telecommunications as the most attractive in the Indian market.  Biotechnology and chemical industries, with somewhat lax environmental standards have also attracted higher FDI.  Investments in coal and iron ore mining have been other areas of attraction.  The future expansion in FDI will essentially depend upon the extent to which the country would attract higher bulk investments in power and other energy sectors.

            It must also be recognised that apart from creating a healthy and conducive economic environment, improved FDI flow also requires congenial procedural arrangements as well as institutional structures devoid of bureaucratic bottlenecks. Studies have shown that in this respect India ’s system still leaves much to be desired.  As referred to above, some rationalisation and simplification of government procedures have taken place but there is still a large area requiring further attention (once it was admitted in Parliament that on an average about 140 or so administrative clearances are required for an FDI proposal to be approved!).  This arises from the larger issue of excessive and rigid bureaucracy in India , which itself requires to be reformed.  Second, India is a complex federal system which involves both the role of the bureaucracy and the diverse political formations with varied degrees of dynamism and lethargy.   Even so, within the existing arrangements, there are enough opportunities for the states to exhibit competitive spirit and attract larger investments.  Some state governments have begun, as cited earlier, to take advantage of the liberal environment but many more are yet to join the fray. Finally, there is the question of the ability for better absorption of superior technology which is one of the hallmarks of FDI flows, particularly in manufacturing areas. In this respect, the successive generations of entrepreneurs are showing dynamism as referred to earlier, but there is a vast segment in the manufacturing sector which is yet to catch up.  The series of reforms that the government has put in place including in corporate governance issues and issues of competitiveness, should go a long way in furthering the country’s interest of larger FDI inflows.

Reference

 

Bajpai, Nirupam and Nandita Dasgupta  (2004): ‘FDI to China and India : The definitional

             differences’, The Hindu Business Line, May 15    

 

 

Highlights of  Current Economic Scene

Agriculture

According to Food Corporation of India (FCI), wheat procurement as on 7 June 2009 has increased to an all time record of 24 million tonnes, as against 21.51 million tonnes achieved during the same period last year. This improvement in procurement is attributed to sharp increase in minimum support price and stable retail prices, which have discouraged private buyers to purchase wheat, form the mandis. Punjab and Haryana, the main contributors of central inventories have added more than 16.8 million tonnes of wheat or 71% of the total lifting of 23.79 million tonnes till date. Other wheat producing states like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar , Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan have also shown a reasonable improvement in procurement over the period of last year. The procurement in Haryana has virtually stopped. The government officials stated that the total procurement would breach the targeted 24.4 million tonnes in this season.

Acreage under sugarcane in Uttar Pradesh is likely to fall by 6% to under 2.02 million hectares in 2009-10 crushing season. This decline in coverage under sugarcane since last couple of years is due to the delay in cane payment and confusion over the price.

According to International Cotton Advisory Committee (IAC), production of cotton is expected to decline for the third consecutive season to 23.4 million tonnes, displaying a downfall of 1% over the period of one year. Production is predicted to decline in Brazil , China , Uzebekistan and Turkey . Global cotton consumption is expected to rise by 1.7% in the financial year 2010 on the back of a global economic recovery. Consumption of cotton is expected to increase in China , India and Pakistan , the three biggest cotton users, while in Bangladesh , Indonesia and Vietnam it would improve marginally. It is predicted that global cotton exports would rise by 8.3% to 6.5 million tonnes during the same period with India contributing the most of it. Opening stocks of cotton at international level in the financial year 2010 is estimated to be at 60 million bales as compared to 56.9 million bales in the previous year.

The Cotton Corporation of India (CCI) stated that cotton arrivals in the market as on 30 May 2009 were around 27.8 million bales as against 30.7 million bales accumulated a year earlier.

As per the official of Soybean Processors Association of India, exports of soyameal is likely to remain below 70,000 tonnes in the month of May, displaying a decline of 80% over the period of one year. Exports are reported to decline due to low arrivals of soyabean crop in the mandis, lower crushing and poor demand from importing countries. Traders believe that farmers are still holding soyabean crop in anticipation of better realisation. During the period October-April 2009 soyameal exports dropped by nearly 30% to 26, 65,095 tonnes from 37, 74,099 tonnes in the corresponding period of the previous season.

Onion exports are expected to decline by 18% in May to about 1.50 lakh tonnes over the corresponding period last year. This reduction is reported to be due to high domestic prices. As per the reports by Nafed, country has so far exported 1.46 lakh tonnes of onion as against 1.77 lakh tonnes exported a year earlier.

Exports of cashew have registered a drop in both volume and value for the first month of the current fiscal. Volume of exports has fallen by 12% during April 2009 as compared to the performance of April 2008. Value has dropped by 2.4% during the same period while dollar realisation is seen lower by 22% for the month. Unit value of realisation has seen an increase at Rs 265.68 per kg as against Rs 239.61 during April 2008.  The small gain in unit realization is due to the shortage of the commodity in the global market and accompanying rally that took place during March-June 2008.

Coffee board reiterated that production estimates of coffee have been reduced for the second time in April after witnessing an excessive rainfall in the major coffee producing state, Karnataka. Coffee production is expected to decline to 262,300 tonnes by the end of September 30, compared with 276,600 tonnes as projected in earlier estimates. India 's coffee exports declined by 19% in the first five months of the current year (January-March) after the crop got damaged due to excessive rainfall. Shipments of coffee have stood at US $190.5 million as compared with US $ 281.7 during the same period a year ago.

Industry

The General Index (IIP) stands at 297.9, which is 2.3% lower as compared to the level in the month of March 2008. The cumulative growth for the period April-March 2008-09 stands at 2.4% over the corresponding period of the previous year.

The annual growth of thee Indices of Industrial Production for the Mining, Manufacturing and Electricity sectors for the month of March 2009   at 0.4%, (-)3.3% and 6.3% as compared to March 2008. The cumulative growth during 2008-09 over the corresponding period of 2007-08 in the three sectors have been 2.3%, 2.3% and 2.8% respectively, which moved the overall growth in the General Index to 2.4%.

In terms of industries, as many as five (5) out of the seventeen (17) industry groups (as per 2-digit NIC-1987) have shown positive growth during the month 2009 as compared to the corresponding month of the previous year. The industry group ‘Beverage etc’ have shown the highest growth of 15.1%, followed by 8.3% in ‘basic chemicals ’ and 6.6% in ‘Rubber and plastic products’.  On the other hand, the industry group ‘Food Products’ have shown a negative growth of 35.8% followed by 25.1% in ‘Wood and Wood Products; Furniture and Fixtures‘ and 18.1% in ‘Leather and Leather Products’.

As per Use-based classification, the Sectoral growth rates in March 2009 over  2008 are  1.4% in Basic goods, (-)8.2% in Capital goods and (-) 4.4% in Intermediate goods. The Consumer durables and Consumer non-durables have recorded growth of 8.3%  and (-) 3.4% respectively, with the overall growth in Consumer goods being negative at 0.8%..

Infrastructure

The Index of Six core industries having a combined weight of 26.7 per cent in the Index of Industrial Production (IIP) with base 1993-94 stood at 243.0 in April 2009 and registered a growth of 4.3%  compared to a growth of 2.3% in April 2008. While crude oil and petroleum products registered declines during the month , electricity, cement, coal and steel registered production increases. However production increase in steel is meager.

Inflation

The annual rate of inflation, calculated on point to point basis, stood at 0.48%  for the week ended 23 May 2009 asd compared to  8.90% during the comparable period last year.

The increase over the week was  very marginal t 0.04%. While the price index of fuel, power,light and lubricants and manufactured products remained stationary at the previous week level, the index for  major group Primary articles witnessed a marginal increase mainly due to increase in the prices of tea, jowar, eggs, condiments etc..

The final wholesale price index for ‘All Commodities’ (Base: 1993-94=100) revised upwards from 227.3 to 228.6 for the week 28 March 2009, and hence the annual rate of inflation based on final index, calculated on point to point basis, stood at0.84 % as compared to 0.26%.

Financial Market Developments

Capital Markets

Primary Market

New demat account registrations have seen an increase over April and May in likely anticipation of big ticket public sector undertakings IPOs (Initial Public Offerings) following the recent announcements coming from government. According to the data from National Securities Depository Ltd (NSDL) and Central Depository Services Ltd, around 1.13 lakh new demat accounts have been added in May and 71,000 in April. This is after having been on a continuous decline for several months up to March this year.

To infuse funds for its business expansion and to independently manage the operations, Big FM, the country’s single-largest private FM radio company in terms of number of licences to operate radio stations (45), will be listed on both the BSE and the NSE within the next two months. It will be the second FM radio operator to have listed on the BSE, after Entertainment Networks India Ltd that operates its radio business under the Radio Mirchi brand. After listing, Reliance Unicom will be the holding company of the Big FM brand.

Secondary Market

The BSE Sensex surged past the 15,000 mark, extending the rally to the thirteenth consecutive week. Government’s plans to introduce a slew of market-oriented economic reforms and some signs of recovery in the domestic and global economies boosted the key indices. The BSE Sensex rose 478 points or 3.3% to 15,104. Mid caps and small caps performed much better than broader indices, rising 7% and 7.8%, respectively. NSE Nifty gained 138 points or 3.1% to 4,587. The Defty rose 3.35% as the rupee remained quite strong.

Members of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) have suggested a phased reduction of the securities transaction tax (STT), as part of a package of measures to develop the capital markets that was discussed with Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee during the week. Removing STT is considered necessary to improve retail participation in the capital markets by reducing transaction costs,

Assets under management (AUM) of several fund houses gained a significant amount in May compared to April, representative of smart inflows from retail investors in the mutual fund industry. The country’s biggest fund house, Reliance mutual fund, crossed the Rs 1 lakh crore mark in May. Fund managers attribute these gains to a surge in the Indian equity market in the last one-month. Data released of 27 fund houses by the Association of Mutual fund in India (Amfi) showed AUM of Rs 4,40,589.64 crore for May, gaining 16.84% or 63,502.22 compared to Rs 3,77,087.41 crore for April. AUM of Reliance MF stood at Rs 1,02,730.15 crore, up by 14,342.16 crore or 16.23% compared to Rs 88,387.98 crore in April.

Riding the wave of optimism over a stable Indian government and positive global cues, domestic companies trading on American bourses saw their total market value zoom by more than USD 20 billion during the month of May. The market capitalisation of 16 Indian firms listed as American Depository Receipts (ADR), soared by $20.41 billion, with private sector lender ICICI Bank and IT major Wipro together accounting for nearly half of the total gains. Among the 16 companies trading on the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq, ICICI Bank’s valuation jumped as much as $5.78 billion. The market value of Wipro climbed $3.72 billion in May. Another major gainer was leading copper producer Sterlite Industries whose valuation went up as much as $3.34 billion.

After the UPA’s success in the election, investors are taking more interest in the public sector units in the expectation of divestment. This is being reflected in the share prices of the PSUs. Wealth of the public sector units' promoter (the government of India ) increased by 42% during the last one year. This has happened probably due to the better sentiment of PSU stocks prices.

 Norwest Venture Partners (NVP) has signed a definitive agreement to acquire 2.11% equity in the Mumbai-based NSE for approximately Rs 250 crore from IL&FS Securities Services Limited (ISSL) valuing the exchange at over Rs 12,000 crores.

 

Derivatives

The derivatives market continued to generate high volumes and premiums remained high during the week. The focus on stock futures significantly increased. Throughout the bull-run of the past three months, the hedge ratio (volume of index instruments to all instruments) has been consistently higher than normal. However, the week saw expanding stock futures volumes. Historically, India generates high stock futures volumes and tends to have low hedge ratios. This can be explained in several ways. All contracts are cash-settled and the lack of an efficient shorting mechanism in the cash segment makes stock futures tempting. Stock futures are instruments that are favoured by individual traders who are optimistic enough to believe that movements will always be in their favour and hence, try to benefit from the leverage. In the Nifty options segment, open interest (OI) increased in both puts and calls. The overall put-call ratio (PCR) is at 1.1 (in terms of OI) and its at 1.25 in June and 0.86 in July and beyond.

Volatility index remained steady throughout the week. It closed the week flat at 40.55 against its previous week’s close of 40.3. The fall from the intra-week high levels suggests that traders may be expecting a steady period for the Nifty futures.

Government Securities Market

Primary Market

The RBI auctioned 91-day TBs and 364-day TBs for the notified amount of Rs 4,500 crore and Rs 1,000 crore, respectively, on 3 June 2009. The cut-off yield for the 91-day TB was set at 3.36% and the 364-day TB was set at 4.0%.

On 4 June 2009, RBI fixed the rate of interest on the floating rate bonds 2009 at 4.12% per annum applicable for the half year (6 June 2009 to 5 December 2009).

Through open market operations (OMO) RBI purchased 3 securities for the aggregate notified amount of Rs 6,000 crore. The cut-off yield for the 7.49% 2017, 8.35% 2022 and 7.95% 2032 was set at 6.92%, 7.35% and 7.65%, respectively.

Secondary Market

On 6 June the money market rates remained soft tracking comfortable liquidity in the system. The call range was noted at 3-3.30%. Considering the volume in overnight money market and amount parked by banks with RBI under the reverse repo window, the extra liquid resources in system are estimated at over Rs 2,00,000 crore. The overnight CBLO rate was seen in the range of 0.50 - 3.24%. The comfortable liquidity was evident from the high recourse to the reverse repurchase window at the liquidity adjustment facility (LAF) auction. The amount absorbed under LAF Reverse Repo operation was noted at Rs 1, 31,290 crore. In addition, the Reserve Bank of India also pumped in additional liquidity through open market operations of three securities 7.49% 2017, 8.35% 2022 and the 7.95% 2032.

Bond yields softened on the back of high liquidity and non-bank institutions chasing government securities as safe haven investments. Traders said high liquidity was partly on account of the RBI’s intervention in the foreign exchange markets to stem the rupee’s buoyancy. The buoyancy was partly on capital inflows, largely driven by Participatory Note investments through FIIs. During the week, FIIs were net buyers of government debt. FII investments in debt papers during the period amounted to $453.7 million (about Rs 2,136 crore). The reduced FII interest followed the hardening of US Treasury yields. Five- year US Treasury hardened by 30 basis points to 2.85%.

Bond Market

During the week under review, 3 banks tapped the bond market to mobilize an amount of Rs 1,350 crore with coupon rates ranging from 8.38-8.72% for 10-years.

Profile of Major Commercial Bond Issues for the Week Ending 6 June 2009

Sr No.

Issuing Company / Rating

Nature of Instrument

Coupon in % per annum and tenor

Amount in Rs crore

 

FIs / Banks

 

 

 

1

Andhra Bank
AAA by Crisil.

Upper Tier II Bonds

8.72% with a step up of 50 bps if call is not exercised at the end of 10 year.

500

2

State Bank of Hyderabad
AAA by Crisil, Care.

Upper Tier II Bonds

8.39% with a step up of 50 bps if call is not exercised at the end of 10 year.

350

3

Bank of Baroda
AAA by Crisil, Care.

Upper Tier II Bonds

8.38% with a step up of 50 bps if call is not exercised at the end of 10 year.

500

 

Total

1350

 

Source: Various Media Sources

 

Foreign Exchange Market

 Ending its three-day losing streak, the rupee recovered marginally on 6 June by nine paise to 47.11/12 against the dollar on a sustained rally in equity markets amid fresh capital inflows. A fresh fall of the dollar against its major rivals also helped the rupee recovery.

The rupee firmed to Rs 47.08 against the dollar during the weekend, up from the previous week’s level of Rs 47.29. Forward premia for one, three, six and 12 months dipped to 3.40% (3.58%), 3.39 (3.52%), 2.78% (3.03%) and 2.38% (2.51%) respectively. Cash to spot premia was 2.16%, down ten basis points over the previous week. However, spreads between spot and the non-deliverable forwards (NDF) widened, though NDF rates firmed to Rs 47.20 from the previous weekend’s level of Rs 47.30%.

Foreign exchange reserves rose $1.66 bn during the week ended 29 May largely on account of dollar purchases by the central bank to stem the rise of the rupee against the dollar. Also, there has been some revaluation impact of non-dollar assets in reserves because the dollar is weakening against the rupee in the international markets. The total foreign exchange reserves including gold and SDR rose $1,667million to touch $262.3bn as on 29 May.

According to Clearing Corporation of India Ltd (CCIL), the volume of rupee forward deals plunged 26% in May from the beginning of the year as companies expect a further reduction in their requirements for hedging against currency fluctuation in a slowing economy. The number of transactions in the rupee forward market—where two parties agree to buy or sell a currency on a future date at a predetermined price—declined to 17,342 in May from a peak of 23,580 at the close of December. In April, the decline was 30% to 16,318 deals.

Currency Derivatives

MCX Stock Exchange announced divestment of 6.48% equity to Union Bank of India and Bank of India through primary offering at Rs.10 per share involving total investment of Rs 87.5 crores in the company. The exchange is also expecting on further 11.52% equity divestment to other banks. This disinvestment is in line with the regulatory requirements of SEBI and subject to further compliances, if any. Total 18% equity will be divested with the top Indian public and private sector banks as strategic investors in the first round. These banks have been long term partners and have earlier invested in MCX, the parent exchange which is also India ’s largest commodity derivative exchange. The daily average volume of the exchange has grown from Rs.324.78 crores in October 2008, when it started operations to Rs.2923.46 crores in May 2009.

Commodities Futures derivatives

Multi Commodity Exchange of India (MCX) will shortly make a final representation to excise authorities requesting a partial modification of excise regulations, which is expected to enable delivery of industrial commodities on the exchange platform.

The spices counter on agri bourse National Commodities and Derivatives Exchange (NCDEX) has been witnessing a session of profit-booking over the past fortnight. Analysts opine that, jeera, turmeric and pepper were overbought and due for correction. Jeera and turmeric are expected to see a further downside pressure. Prices of these commodities shot up on account of supply constraints and export demand. According to analysts, the imposition of special margin on turmeric by FMC on 25 April also dented sentiment.

The new government will reintroduce the bill to amend the Forward Contract (Regulation) Act, 1952 (FCRA) in the Budget session of Parliament, expected to begin last week of June or early July. The bill provides more autonomy to the Forward Market Commission (FMC) and it also gives it necessary legal power to oversee the orderly functioning of the commodities markets. The bill proposes to increase the number of members from four to nine up to three whole-time members and a chairman. It confers power upon the FMC to recruit it officers and employees.

Insurance

The country’s largest institutional investors, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) is expected to step up equity investment by 25% to around Rs 50,000 crore in equities, as against Rs 40,300 crore during 2008-09. Accordingly, LIC is scanning around 200 companies on a daily basis for possible investments.

Japan ’s Nomura Group is set to acquire 35% in LIC Mutual Fund, India 's seventh largest mutual fund. As of April 2009, LIC Mutual Fund had assets under management (AUM) of Rs 24,104 crore over 32 schemes.

SBI Life Insurance has tied up with Syndicate Bank to offer housing loan insurance cover to the home loan borrowers of Syndicate Bank till June 30, 2009.

ICICI Prudential Life has launched a wealth creation policy ‘SecureSave’ enabling customers to get the benefits of security and growth on the savings.  Investors can avail a guaranteed maturity benefit up to 150% of the sum of all premiums paid by a policyholder.

Banking

At present State Bank of India (SBI) is operating four branches and seven ATMs in Singapore and is planning to double its branch network in the current fiscal year by opening four new branches. SBI has got qualified full banking (QFB) status as part of reciprocal measure to allow DBS Bank of Singapore to open eight more branches in India by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). SBI is the first Indian bank to get such privileges, which enables it to establish up to 25 branches, including ATMs over a period of time.

The country’s second largest bank, ICICI Bank has announced a 0.50 % reduction in both retail and corporate loans. The revised floating reference rate (FRR) stands at 12.75%, against 13.25% at present. The bank also announced a 0.50% reduction in its benchmark advance rate to 15.75%. All existing floating-rate retail loan customers will benefit from the new reduced rates. ICICI Bank’s new floating reference rate is applicable to all floating-rate retail loans (including home loans) and will come into effect from June 5, 2009.

Three public sector banks, Bank of Baroda (BOB), Indian Overseas Bank (IOB) and Andhra Bank have signed a joint venture (JV) agreement for setting up India BIA Bank ( Malaysia ) Bhd, a banking subsidiary in Malaysia . The JV has obtained necessary approval from RBI for setting up the subsidiary, which will be serving the banking needs of all sections of population and corporates in Malaysia . The three banks together will be investing Rs 405 crore to set up the new subsidiary in which BoB, IOB and Andhra Bank will be investing 40%, 35% and 25% respectively. 

Union Bank of India wants to strengthen its presence in the syndicated loan market by targeting a volume of Rs 25,000 crore in the current fiscal year, a six-fold increase from the current disbursements.

Corporate

In the month of May 2009, JSW Steel has reported a growth of 33% in crude steel production to 4.59 lakh tonnes as compared to 3.46 lakh tonnes in the same period last year. 

Oil and Natural Gas Corp (ONGC) has approved the revised cost estimates for developing the nation’s most prolific on-land oilfield in Rajasthan and accordingly will be investing around $350 million more in the fields operated by Cairn India . ONGC holds around 30% interests in the field. The approval ends the uncertainty surrounding the development and the fields will now be soon put to production.

Lucas India Services, part of the $5 billion TVS Group has forayed into the organized car accessories retail market and will be investing around Rs 180 crore to set up 108 stores in 32 cities in India over the next five years.

NTPC is looking to acquire coal assets abroad to secure coal for its planned generation of 55,895 MW by the end of 2012. As per the 11th Plan Period the company is targeting to add another 22,000 MW with a capital expenditure of Rs 55,000 crore. NTPC has tied up with the State Bank of India for Rs 25,000 crore debt to fund part of the expansion.

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (HPCL) is investing Rs 614 crore in the two sugar mills it had bought in Bihar to manufacture ethanol, which will be blended with petrol.

State-run BHEL has bagged an Rs 375 crore order for executing two gas turbine generating units for a project in Oman . The scope of the order includes supply, erection and commissioning of two gas turbine generating units of 126 MW each for a power project being set up by Petroleum Development Oman at Amal.

Global soft drink player Pepsico is investing Rs 1,000 crore in the current calendar year to increase the capacity of its beverages business across the country. The new investment will be spread across manufacturing capacity, market infrastructure, supply chain and R&D.

External Sector

Exports during April  2009  at US$ 10743 million which was one-third  lower than that in April 2008 Imports during April were valued at US $ 15741 million, a decrease of 36.6 per cent over that of US$ 24823 million in April 2008.Thus the trade balance during the month worked out to be $ 5004 as compared to $8747. While oil imports was valued at $3634 million, that of non-oil imports was  lower by 24.6% at $ 12113 million.

Information Technology

The aggregate exports of software and IT enabled services from Mohali, Chandigarh and Panchkula have jumped to Rs 1,051 crore in 2008-09 against Rs 806 crore in 2007-08, as per data provided by Software Technology Parks of India (STPI). Of the total exports of Rs 1,051 crore, the exports from SEZs of Chandigarh increased to Rs 318 crore in 2008-09, posting a growth of 127% in one year of its operation. Infosys Technologies, retained the position of top IT exporter from this region as its total exports, including SEZ, was Rs 565 crore against Rs 343 crore in the year-ago period.

IBM will be providing enterprise information technology infrastructure services to India Glycols Ltd, a market leader in India for glycols and other value added specialty chemicals. IBM will host and manage the IT infrastructure including IBM’s state-of-the-art Blade Center and N-Series Storage System Solution, as well as the non-disruptive data migration and storage level data replication to its remote site located in Kashipur, Uttarakhand.

Essar Group’s back office unit Aegis Ltd is augmenting its workforce by 12,000 summing up the total headcount to 43,000 by end of the current fiscal year. The company is planning to hire 1,000 people every month in India and across United States , Philippines , Costa Rica and Africa where it currently has operations.

Telecom 

State-owned Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL) is planning to follow the private sector practice of long-term tendering with a selected bidder as against the present practice of multiple tendering. BSNL is seriously thinking of changing the method of issuing tender in an attempt to prevent the repeat of tendering delays which has held up its many on-going projects. The present system of frequent tendering causes delays in awarding the contract, as vendors often dispute the selection process and move to courts. For instance, the 45.5-million GSM line expansion tender floated in mid-2006 was awarded only a year later, by when the company lost its second position in the GSM segment to Vodafone-Essar. As per the revised method, each time the company wants to expand its GSM mobile capacity it wouldn’t have to float a fresh tender as it does now. Instead, the selected lowest bidder would be awarded all subsequent projects for several years. BSNL will be disbursing the incremental payments on the basis of per line capacity expansion, which would be negotiated according to the prevalent market price. BSNL’s new tendering system, however, needs to be first approved by its board, and later by the government.

Recently, Bharti Airtel has announced that it had reinitiated discussions with MTN for a 49% stake in the South African company in return for a 36% stake in the Indian company. The transaction would involve $10 billion in cash and a share swap worth $13 billion. The deal would create a $20-billion entity with a subscriber base of over 200 million in 24 countries. Meantime, Singapore-based SingTel is in discussions with Bharti Airtel to increase the cash component of its contribution to the partnership should the Bharti-MTN deal materialise. At present, SingTel has an effective 30.5% stake in Bharti Airtel and the deal between Bharti and the MTM would result in a significant dilution of SingTel’s holding in Bharti.

 

Macroeconomic Indicators

Table 1 : Index Numbers of Industrial Production (1993-94 =100)

Table 2 : Production in Infrastructure Industries (Physical Output Series)

Table 3: Procurment, Offtake and Stock of foodgrains

Table 4: Index Numbers of  Wholesale Prices (1993-94 = 100)

Table 5 : Cost of Living Indices

Table 6 : Budgetary Position of Government of India

Table 7 : Government Borrowing Programmes and Performance

Table 8 : Scheduled Commercial Banks - Business in India  

Table 9 : Money Stock : components and Sources

Table 10 : Reserve Money : Components and Sources

Table 11 : Average Daily Turnover in Call Money Market

Table 12 : Assistance Sanctioned and Disbursed by All-India Financial Institutions

Table 13 : Capital Market

Table 14 : Foreign Trade

Table 15 : India's Overall Balance of Payments

Table 16 : Foreign Investment Inflows  
Table 17 : Foreign Collaboration Approvals (Route-Wise)
Table 18 : Year-Wise (Route-Wise) Actual Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI/NRI)

Table 19 : NRI Deposits - Outstandings

Table 20 : Foreign Exchange Reserves

Table 21 : Indices REER and NEER of the Indian Rupee

Table 22 : Turnover in Foreign Exchange Market  
Table 23 : India's Template on International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity [As reported under the IMFs special data dissemination standards (SDDS)
Table 24 : Settlement Volume and Netting Factor for Government Securities Transactions Settled at CCIL - Monthly, Quarterly and Annual Basis.
Table 25 : Inter-Catasegory Distribution of All Types of Trade in Government Securities Settled at CCIL (With Market Share in Respective Trade Types) 
Table 26 : Settlement Volume and Netting Factor for Total Forex Transactions Settled at CCIL - Monthly, Quarterly and Annual Basis.
Table 27 : Inter-Category Distribution of Total Foreign Exchange Transactions Settled at CCIL (With Market Share in Respective Trade Types) 

 

Memorandum Items

CSO's Quarterly Estimates of GDP  

GDP at Factor Cost by Economic Activity

India's Overall Balance of Payments: Quarterly

India's Overall Balance of Payments: Annual  

*These statistics and the accompanying review are a product arising from the work undertaken under the joint ICICI research centre.org-EPWRF Data Base Project.

LIST OF WEEKLY THEMES


We will be grateful if you could kindly send us your feed back at epwrf@vsnl.com