* * Our SDP  Database  for 40 years now available on interactive CD-ROM  * *                                            * * Our NAS  Database  for 52 years now available on interactive CD-ROM  * *                                      * * Our ASI  Database  for 25 years now available on interactive CD-ROM  * *

Current Economic Statistics and Review For the Week 
Ended November 03, 2007 (43rd Weekly Report of 2007)

 

Theme of the week:

 

All-India Debt and Investment Survey

Section 14

Cost of Debt – Purpose-wise Debt  *

 

 “It is a sign of flourishing economic activity in the

 society if large numbers of households have taken

 loans and the loan taken is utilised for productive

 purpose”.

AIDIS

I

Introduction

 

The  National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) has collected in their 59th round conducted during calendar year 2003 (January-December) through  All-India Debt and Investment survey (AIDIS) hr information on the purpose for which a lon was taken by households besides various other characteristics of households nd their loan particular. Different theme notes have been submitted earlier covering various characteristics of households indebtedness t all India and state level for rural and urban households. This note 13 in the series, attempts the analysis the reasons or the purpose for which households borrowed cash loans from various institutional and non-institutional agencies and their end uses.

 

The purpose for which a loans are taken by household can be more than one. In such cases, the purpose for which the maximum amount of loan were originally intended to spent, has been considered as the main purpose of loan by the NSSO. Secondly, even if a loan was utilized for a purpose other than the one specified in the contractual document, the original purpose of borrowing was only considered by the NSSO.

The purposes for which a loan has been borrowed are broadly grouped under a) productive and non-productive. While the former covers both capital and current expenditures in farm and non-farm business, the latter covers the purposes like daily household expenditures, purchase of consumer goods, litigation, repayment of debt, etc. The analytical details of these results are presented in the following sections.

 

II

Debt According to Purpose

Table 1 presents households expenditure of cash loans outstanding classified into productive and non-productive expenditures, as revealed by the result of  NSSO’s 59th round survey ( Report N0 501).

           

Table 1: Broad Pattern of Households – Debt By Purpose

 
Rural
Urban
All
Number of Households (in million)

Total Households

147.9

(100.0)

55.5

(100.0)

203.4

(100.0)

Indebted Households

39.2

(26.5)

9.9

(17.8)

49.1

(24.1)

Productive Purpose

19.3

(13.0)

2.0

(3.6)

21.3

(10.5)

Non-Productive Purpose

22.9

(15.5)

8.2

(14.8)

31.1

(15.3)

Amount of Cash Debt and Purpose-wise Expenditure ( in Rs crore)

Total Cash Debt Outstanding

111468

(100.0)

65327

(100.0)

176795

(100.0)

Productive Purpose

59078

(53.0)

16267

(24.9)

75345

(42.6)

Non-Productive Purpose

52390

(47.0)

49060

(75.1)

101450

(57.4)

Note: Data on households is as given by NSSO in their report No. 501. The sum of Individual items will not tally with total.

Data on cash debt is worked out by applying the respective ratios to the total debt.

Figures in brackets are percentages to total.

Source: NSSO (2005), AIDIS, Report No. 501.

 

It may be seen from the Table  that out of 203.4 million households in India ,  49.1 million households forming about 24.1 per cent are indebted by an aggregate amount of Rs. 176,795 crore. Out of this, an amount of  Rs. 75,345 crore or 42.6 per cent of their total debt has been spent by 21.3 million indebted households (10.5 per cent of total households) on productive purposes (Table 1). As against this, 31.1 million indebted households forming about 15.3 per cent of total households reported Rs. 101,450 crore or 57.4 per cent of total debt for non-productive purposes.

 

Out of 39.2 million indebted rural households, 19.3 million households reported an amount of Rs. 59,078 crore or 53.0 per cent of their total debt for productive purposes. A sum of Rs. 52,390 crore or 47.0 per cent of the total debt outstanding had been spent on non-productive purposes, by 22.9 million indebted households.

 

In contrast, in urban areas, 8.2 million indebted households reported  an amount of Rs. 49,060 or 75.1 per cent of their total debt for non-productive purposes. A small portion of  urban households numbering 2.1 million debt for productive purposes with a sum of Rs. 16,267 crore or about 25 per cent of their total debt.

 
III

Productive Purposes

As stated, the expenditure incurred for productive purposes can be incurred in farm or non-farm business and for capital/ current expenditures. Productive utilization of debt incurred by households will help augment their economic activities and thereby promote economic welfare. On the other hand, if debt is incurred for purposes, which do not produce any increase in production of goods and services, then such expenditure gets classified as unproductive. Hence, understanding of the purposes of loan taken becomes crucial. Thus, purposes of loan taken have been broadly  classified, as stated,  as productive purposes and non-productive purposes,  i.e. for household expenditure.

Farm business includes household economic activities like cultivation, including cultivation of plantation and orchard crops and processing of produce on the farm, e.g., paddy hulling and gur making if it is carried out in the firm by indigenous method. It also includes ancillary agriculture activities such as livestock raising, poultry, fishing, dairy, bee keeping and other allied activities coming under tabulation category A and B of the National Industrial Classification 1998. Expenditure incurred in farm business on account of purchase, own construction, major repairs, building and other land improvements including reclamation of land, alterations and improvement of buildings and other constructions constitute capital expenditure. The current expenditure includes expenditure for purchase of seeds, manure, fodder, payment of wages, rent, land revenue, etc. and also expenditure on normal repairs and maintenance of building, machinery and transport equipment, furniture and fixtures and household durables meant for farm business.

Table 2: Estimated Number of Households and Debt

Productive Purposes - Farm Business

 

Rural

Urban

All

Number of Households in ' 00

Productive

193582

(100.0)

19767

(100.0)

213349

(100.0)

Farm Business

151187

(78.1)

224

(1.1)

151411

(71.0)

  Capital Expenditure

81932

(42.3)

92

(0.5)

82024

(38.4)

  Current Expenditure

75476

(39.0)

132

(0.7)

75608

(35.4)

Amount of Cash Debt in Rs.crore

Productive

59078

(100.0)

16267

(100.0)

75345

(100.0)

Farm Business

45702

(77.4)

5689

(35.0)

51391

(68.2)

  Capital Expenditure

29873

(50.6)

4685

(28.8)

34558

(45.9)

  Current Expenditure

15829

(26.8)

1004

(6.2)

16833

(22.3)

Note: Data on households is as given by NSSO in their report No. 501  Sum of individual will not tally with the total Data on cash debt is worked out by applying the respective ratios to the total debt.

Figures in brackets are percentages to total.

Source: NSSO (2005), AIDIS, Report No. 500.

 

            Out of the 21.3 million indebted households who reported of Rs. 75,345 crore debt for productive purposes, 15.1 million households or 71 per cent of the households, reported an amount (of Rs. 51,391 crore or 68.2 per cent of productive debt) for productive purposes on farm business. Among these households 38.4 per cent reported debt for capital expenditure and 35.4 per cent for current expenditure.Of the debt for productive purposes, an amount of RS.16,833 crore has been for current expenditure and Rs. 34,558 crore has been for capital expenditure purposes ( Table 2). In rural areas, 15.1 million households (78.2 per cent of the households who reported debt for productive purpose as on 30-6-2002), reported debt for expenditure on farm business to the tune of Rs. 45,702 crore with capital expenditure purpose amounting to Rs. 29,873 crore and for current expenditure, Rs. 15,829 crore. In urban areas a tiny 1.1 per cent household reported debt for incurred expenditure on farm business aggregating  Rs. 5,689 crore with capital and current expenditure purpose amounting to Rs. 4,685 crore and Rs. 1,004 crore, respectively.

Non-Farm Business is defined as all activities of households other than those covered in the farm business. This covers manufacturing, mining and quarrying, trade, hotels and restaurant, transport, construction, repairing and other services. Any activities carried out in non-household enterprises are excluded from the above definition. Also, non-farm business enterprises, which were registered under section 2m(i) or 2m(ii) and Section 85 of Factories Act 1948 and bidi and cigar manufacturing establishments registered under   Bidi and Cigar Workers (condition of employment) Act, 1966 were also not included in the above definition. The expenditure is treated as capital, if the households spend the cash dues for purchase, own construction, additions, alterations, major repairs and improvement of buildings, other constructions, machinery and transport equipment, furniture and fixture, etc. Expenditure on bundings and other land improvement including reclamation of land, pertaining to non-farm business also included in capital expenditure. Current expenditure on non-farm business has also been includes expenditure on account of purchase of raw materials, fuel and lubricants, payment of rent, salary and wages, hire charges of machinery and equipment, etc., and normal repairs and maintenance of buildings, construction, machinery and equipment including transport equipment, furniture and fixtures and household durables meant for the non-farm business.

Table 3 : Estimated Number of Households and Reported Debt 

Productive Purposes - Non-Farm Business

 

Rural

Urban

All

Number of Households in ' 00

Productive

193582

(100.0)

19767

(100.0)

213349

(100.0)

Non-Farm Business

42305

(21.9)

14896

(75.4)

57201

(26.8)

  Capital Expenditure

30409

(15.7)

10341

(52.3)

40750

(19.1)

  Current Expenditure

12356

(6.4)

4787

(24.2)

17143

(8.0)

Amount of Cash Debt in Rs.crore

Productive

59078

(100.0)

16267

(100.0)

75345

(100.0)

Non-Farm Business

13376

(22.6)

12869

(79.1)

26245

(34.8)

  Capital Expenditure

10255

(17.4)

10779

(66.3)

21034

(27.9)

  Current Expenditure

3121

(5.3)

2090

(12.8)

5211

(6.9)

Note: Data on households is as given by NSSO in their report No. 501.Sum of individual will not tally with the total. Data on cash debt is worked out by applying the respective ratios to the total debt 

Figures in brackets are percentages to total.

Source: NSSO (2005), AIDIS, Report No. 501.

 

An amount of Rs. 26,245 crore or about 35 per cent of the total debt for productive purposes, has been reported for non-farm business by 5.7 million households as on 30-6-2002. Of these households, the incidence of debt between capital and current expenditures on non-farm business is 19.1 per cent and 8.0 per cent respectively, and they had absorbed 27.9 per cent and 6.9 per cent of the debt of Rs. 75,345  crore  reported for productive purposes.

In rural areas ,2 million households reported debt for productive purposes in non-farm business aggregating to Rs. 13,376 crore with capital expenditure being Rs. 10, 255 crore and current expenditure at Rs. 3,121 crore.

Unlike rural households, urban households reported debt spent more for productive non-farm business. About 1.5 million indebted households, forming 75.4 per cent of urban households reporting debt for productive purposes reported debt for non-farm business an amount of Rs. 12,869 crore.. On this amount, debt for  capital and current expenditure purposes amounted to Rs. 10,779 crore and 2,090 crore. 

IV

Non-Productive Purposes

As defined earlier debt for  non-productive purposes includes household expenditure, expenditure on litigation, repayment of debt, financial investment and other expenditure.

Household expenditure is defined to include purchase of residential plot, construction, addition, alteration of building for residential purposes, purchase of durable goods and assets, clothes, etc. and expenditure of medical treatment, education, marriages, ceremonies etc.

Out of the 31.1 million indebted households who reported debt of Rs. 1,01,450 crore for non-productive purposes, 26.0 million households (or 83.6 per cent) reported debt for expenditure on household goods amounting of  Rs. 76,577 crore or 75.5 per cent of total debt for  non-productive purposes.

Similar trend is also witnessed among both rural and urban households (Table 4).

 

Table 4: Estimated Number of Households and Debt

Non-Productive Purposes

 

Rural

Urban

All

Number of Households in ' 00

Non-Productive

229106

(100.0)

81592

(100.0)

310698

(100.0)

  Household Expend.

190816

(83.3)

68945

(84.5)

259761

(83.6)

  Others

42840

(18.7)

14229

(17.4)

57069

(18.4)

Amount of Cash Debt in Rs. crore

Non-Productive

52390

(100.0)

49060

(100.0)

101450

(100.0)

  Household Expend.

39014

(74.5)

37563

(76.6)

76577

(75.5)

  Others

13376

(25.5)

11497

(23.4)

24873

(24.5)

Note: Data on households is as given by NSSO in their report No. 501, Data on cash debt is worked out by applying the respective ratios to the total debt .Sum of individual items will not tally with the total.

Figures in brackets are percentages to total.

Source: NSSO (2005), AIDIS, Report No. 501.

 

V

Purpose of Households Debt  by Occupational  Categories

Rural Households

The purpose of debt of rural household classified by their occupational categories, i.e., by cultivators and non-cultivator categories are presented in Table 5.

All rural households operating at least 0.002 hectare of land during the last 365 days preceding the date of survey have been defined as cultivator households. As per the survey they have borrowed more for productive purposes than by non-cultivator households. While the share of the former was around 62 per cent of their debt as on June 30, 2002, the latter held only a share of 28 per cent for productive purposes.

Out of 88.2 million cultivator households, 26,2 million (or 29.7 per cent) households  are indebted. Among them, 15.7 million households ( or 17.8 per cent total cultivator households) invested about 62 per cent of their total debt of Rs. 505,777 crore in productive purposes. The remaining debt of Rs. 311,310 crore (or 38 per cent of their debt) was utilized for non-productive purposes by 12.9 million indebted cultivator households. Household expenditure is the major item of purpose among non-productive purposes and the debt reported against this purpose is estimated to be Rs.226,333 crore.

 

Rural households operating no land or holding land less than 0.002 hectare, are termed as non-cultivator households and they are further classified into agricultural labourers and artisans. As referred to above, about 28 per cent of their cash debt was for productive purposes and the remaining amount was for non-productive purposes with Rs. 163,675 crore meant for household expenditure.

Table 5 : Purpose of Debt of Rural Households – Occupational Categories

 

Cultivator

Non-Cultivator

 

No.of Hhs

Cash Dues

No.of Hhs

Cash Dues

 

Million

Rs.crore

Million

Rs.crore

Productive Purpose

15.7

(17.8)

505777

(61.9)

3.60

(6.1)

84218

(28.3)

    Farm Business

13.6

(15.4)

428971

(52.5)

1.50

(2.5)

27676

(9.3)

    Non-Farm Business

2.1

(2.4)

76806

(9.4)

2.10

(3.6)

56542

(19.0)

Non-Productive Purpose

12.9

(14.6)

311310

(38.1)

10.00

(16.8)

212480

(71.4)

    Household Expenditure

10.7

(12.1)

226333

(27.7)

8.50

(14.2)

163675

(55.0)

    Others

2.2

(2.3)

84977

(10.4)

1.50

(2.5)

48805

(16.4)

All Purpose

26.2

(29.7)

817087

(100.0)

13.00

(21.8)

297591

(100.0)

Note: Figures in brackets are percentage to total households/cash loans of respective

 occupational categories. Total will not tally due to rounding off and not reported

Source: NSSO (2005), AIDIS, Report No. 501.

 

Urban Households

            Urban households are broadly grouped under ‘self employed’ and ‘others’. Self-employed households are those engaged in the farm or non-farm enterprises of their households and in urban areas, a household was considered as self-employed, if major source of income during 365 days preceding the date of survey was derived from self-employment of its members. Urban households reporting the major source of its income was derived from regular wage/salaried employment of members were treated as ‘regular wage/salaried’ households. Casual labour household are those household whose members derives their income mainly from casual wage employment. All the remaining urban households were treated as ‘other’ households.

Out of 20.1 million self-employed households, 3.60 million or 17.9 per cent are indebted. Among them, 1.50 million households forming 7.5 per cent of total self employed households, invested about 55 per cent of their total debt, Rs. 134,604 crore in productive purposes. The remaining debt of Rs. 108,803 crore or about 45 per cent of their total debt has been utilised for non-productive purpose by 2.25 million self-employed households. Household expenditure is the major item of expenditure among non-productive purposes and debt for this purpose is estimated to be 79,837 crore.

 

Table 6: Purpose of Debt Urban Households – Occupational Categories

 

Self-Employed

Others

 

No.of Hhs

Cash Dues

No.of Hhs

Cash Dues

 

Million

Rs.crore

Million

Rs.crore

Productive Purpose

1.50

(7.5)

134604

(55.3)

0.46

(1.3)

27864

(6.8)

    Farm Business

0.34

(1.7)

28235

(11.6)

0.14

(0.4)

5327

(1.3)

    Non-Farm Business

1.16

(5.8)

106369

(43.7)

0.32

(0.9)

22537

(5.5)

Non-Productive Purpose

2.25

(11.2)

108803

(44.7)

5.91

(16.7)

381492

(93.1)

    Household Expenditure

1.89

(9.4)

79837

(32.8)

4.99

(14.1)

295441

(72.1)

    Others

0.36

(2.3)

28965

(11.9)

0.92

(2.6)

86461

(21.1)

All-Purpose

3.60

(17.9)

243407

(100.0)

6.30

(17.8)

409766

(100.0) 

Note: Figures in brackets are percentage to total households/cash loans of respective

occupational categories. Total will not tally with sum of the component due to rounding off and not reported

Source: NSSO (2005), AIDIS, Report No. 501.

 

The urban households which are termed as ‘Others’ utilized 93.1 per cent of their debt forn non-productive purposes and in particular for household expenditure which amounts to  Rs. 295,441 crore or 72.1 per cent of their total debt (Table 6). Their outlay on productive purpose is less than 7 per cent of their total debt.

VI

Trend in Productive Debt Over the Years

            The trends in the share of debt for productive purpose over the period from 1951 for rural households have been presented in Table 7. The percentage of cash debt spent on productive purposes was at 43 per cent in 1951, which after falling to 38 per cent in 1962, picked up in the next two decades to reach 66 per cent by 1981. However, in the next two decades, there has been a drastic fall in the share to 53.0 per cent in 2002 (Data for 1991 in this respect, appear an aberration).

 

Overall, the portion of total household debt in rural areas utilized for consumption purpose has been on rise rather for productive purposes.

 

Table 7: Percentage Distribution of Cash Debt by Purpose of Loan

Rural Households

Purpose of Loans

1951

1962

1971

1981

1991

2002

Farm-Business

37.2

32.5

44.6

60.0

15.0

41.0

  Capital Expenditure

27.9

23.9

31.1

42.4

12.0

26.8

  Current Expenditure

9.3

8.6

13.5

17.6

3.0

14.2

Non-Farm Business

6.6

5.9

5.5

8.9

7.8

12.0

  Capital Expenditure

1.7

3.8

7.2

5.8

9.2

  Current Expenditure

4.2

1.7

1.7

2.0

2.8

Productive Purpose

43.8

38.4

50.1

65.9

22.8

53.0

Non-Productive

56.3

61.6

49.9

34.1

77.2

47.0

  Household Expenditure

50.2

51.3

40.9

22.4

40.1

35.0

  Other Purposes

6.1

10.3

9.0

8.7

37.1

12.1

   Repayment of Debt

4.9

1.8

0.8

 

1.4

   Expenditure on Litigation

1.6

0.7

0.2

 

0.3

   Financial Investment

0.2

0.7

0.9

 

0.7

All

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

Note : Other purpose includes also not reported/unspecified.

 

 

Source: See Table 1 and NSSO 48th Round Survey

 

 

             RBI(1997), K.G.K.Subba Rao, K.S.Ramachandra Rao and A.K.Tripathi,

            " Indebtedness of Rural Households-A Profile", RBI Occassional Papers

               June-September.

 

 

 

 

 

Cultivator and Non-Cultivator Households

            A better insight in to the changing pattern in purpose of debt of rural households, is brought out by analyzing the behaviour of cultivator and non-cultivator households in rural areas (Tables 8 and 9).

Cultivator households have a much higher proportion of debt earmarked for productive purposes than non-cultivator households.  But, the fluctuating trend shown above are generally valid for both the categories of rural households. It is interesting to note for cultivator households, the declining share of farm business expenditure (from 63.8 per cent in 1981 to 52.5 per cent in 2002) in the total debt and within it, that of capital expenditure (from 45.3 per cent to 34.3 per cent)  (Table 8).  The increase in the share of non-farm business expenditure for capital or current expenditures purposes has not compensated  the decline in share of farm business expenditure. 

 

Table 8: Percentage Distribution of Cash Debt by Purpose of

Loans - Rural Areas - Cultivator Households

Purpose of Loans

1962

1971

1981

1991

2002

Farm-Business

36.6

49.7

63.8

17.6

52.5

  Capital Expenditure

26.8

34.7

45.3

14.4

34.3

  Current Expenditure

9.8

15.0

18.5

3.2

18.2

Non-Farm Business

3.5

4.3

7.8

6.2

9.4

  Capital Expenditure

1.4

3.2

6.3

4.7

7.4

  Current Expenditure

2.1

1.1

1.5

1.5

2.0

Productive Purpose

40.1

54.0

71.6

23.8

62.9

Non-Productive

60.0

46.0

28.4

76.2

38.1

  Household Expenditure

49.2

37.8

20.0

36.1

27.7

  Other Purposes

10.8

7.2

8.4

39.1

10.4

    Repayment of Debt

5.0

1.5

0.1

 

1.5

    Expenditure on Litigation

1.8

0.7

0.8

 

0.3

    Financial Investment

0.2

0.2

1.0

 

0.6

All

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

Source: See Table 7

 

 

 

 

 

Table 9: Percentage Distribution of Cash Dues by Purpose of

Loans - Rural Non- Cultivator Households

Purpose of Loans                       1962   1971   1981   1991   2002

Farm-Business

8.7

7.5

14.3

3.1

9.3

  Capital Expenditure

6.9

5.0

8.4

2.4

6.3

  Current Expenditure

1.8

2.5

5.9

0.7

3.0

Non-Farm Business

20.2

13.7

23.3

13.6

19.0

  Capital Expenditure

3.5

8.0

18.8

9.8

14.2

  Current Expenditure

16.7

5.7

4.5

3.8

4.8

Productive Purpose

29.0

21.2

37.6

16.7

28.5

Non-Productive

71.0

78.8

62.4

83.3

71.5

  Household Expenditure

63.6

63.4

51.0

55.2

55.0

  Other Purposes

7.3

15.4

11.4

28.1

16.5

    Repayment of Debt

4.4

4.0

1.5

 

1.3

    Expenditure on Litigation

1.0

1.2

0.0

 

0.2

    Financial Investment

0.1

1.0

0.5

 

1.0

All

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

Source: See Table 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interestingly, even the non-farm business expenditure of non-cultivator households has fallen from 23.3 per cent in 1981 to 19.0 per cent in 2002.  Non-farm households have always utilised  more than 50 per cent of their debt  for household expenditures (Table 9).

 

A similar analysis of urban households also reveals that the purpose of debt for household expenditure accounts for the largest share. Further in respect of self-employed, share of non-farm business expenditure has sharply declined from 57 per cent in 1981 to 44 per cent of their debt in 2002 (Table 10).

 

In the case of self-employed household debt for productive purposes has witnessed a fall in its share from about 72 per cent in 1981  to 55 per cent in 2002. In the case of household category, ‘others’, the share of non-productive purposes i.e., household expenditure during the last three decades has always been high ranging between  85 to 95 per cent of the total debt.

 

Table 10: Percentage Distribution of Cash Dues by Purpose of Loans

 

All Urban Households

Self-Employed

Others

Purpose of Loans

1981

1991

2002

1981

1991

2002

1981

1991

2002

Farm-Business

10.0

2.6

5.2

15.3

5.9

11.6

5.4

0.4

1.3

  Capital Expenditure

5.6

2.5

3.3

7.2

5.7

7.3

4.3

0.3

0.9

  Current Expenditure

4.4

0.1

1.9

8.1

0.2

4.4

1.1

0.1

0.4

Non-Farm Business

31.6

14.8

19.7

56.6

29.2

43.7

9.8

4.3

5.5

  Capital Expenditure

23.3

10.8

16.5

41.6

21.1

36.1

7.3

3.3

4.8

  Current Expenditure

8.3

4.0

3.2

15.0

8.1

7.5

2.5

1.0

0.7

Productive Purpose

41.6

17.4

24.9

71.9

35.1

55.3

15.2

4.7

6.8

Non-Productive

58.4

82.6

75.1

28.1

64.9

44.7

84.8

95.3

93.1

  Household Expenditure

35.1

73.7

57.5

13.1

48.3

32.8

54.3

91.9

72.1

  Other Purposes

23.3

8.9

17.6

15.0

16.6

11.9

30.5

3.4

11.1

All

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

Source: See Table 7

VII

 Households Debt by Purpose and Asset Holding Class

            The general presumption, that the poorer households i.e. households with less value of assets, borrow mostly for unproductive purposes like incurring household expenditure and other similar needs whereas the comparatively richer households, i.e., households with larger asset holdings, would borrow mainly for productive purposes  is examined from the results of NSSO survey.

Rural Households

 Table 11 gives the number of households and the incidence of debt by different asset holding classes of rural households according to the purpose of debt.

 

As on 30-6-2002, there are 147.9 million rural households and of which, 39.2 million indebted households. The smallest asset holding class ( less than Rs. 15,000 ) cover 1.7 million indebted households . Among them, it can be seen that only 0.38 million households had their debt for productive purposes with the incidence working out to be 3.4 per cent corresponds  1.34 million households,  with an incidence of 11.9 per cent, reporting their debt for non-productive purposes, and in particular for  1.20 million households reporting debt for purpose with the incidence as high as 10.7 per cent (Table 11).

As increasing asset holding classes are considered, it can be seen that more and more households have reported debt for productive purposes and at largest asset holding class ( Rs. 8 lack and above) , 2.5 million households or about 25 per cent of total rural households in that asset holding class have reported debt for productive purposes and only 1.13 million households reported for on non-productive purposes. It is interesting to note the incidence of indebtedness is as high as 32.9 per cent in the largest asset holding class.

 

Table 11: Estimated Number of Households

Asset

Productive

Farm

Non-Farm

Non-

Household

Total

All

Holding

Purpose

 

 

Productive

Expendi-

Indebted

Households

Class (000)

 

 

 

Purpose

ture

Households

 

Rural Households in ' 00

0-15

3827

1688

2139

13395

12044

16885

112564

 

(3.4)

(1.5)

(1.9)

(11.9)

(10.7)

(15.0)

(100.0)

15-30

7843

4289

3554

16420

14215

23283

122540

 

(6.4)

(3.5)

(2.9)

(13.4)

(11.6)

(19.0)

(100.0)

30-60

19000

12448

6552

38437

32540

55035

218391

 

(8.7)

(5.7)

(3.0)

(17.6)

(14.9)

(25.2)

(100.0)

60-100

23562

17077

6485

37397

31993

57284

216167

 

(10.9)

(7.9)

(3.0)

(17.3)

(14.8)

(26.5)

(100.0)

100-150

25336

19139

6197

31533

26247

52677

182274

 

(13.9)

(10.5)

(3.4)

(17.3)

(14.4)

(28.9)

(100.0)

150-200

19351

15506

3845

21786

18710

36779

128151

 

(15.1)

(12.1)

(3.0)

(17.0)

(14.6)

(28.7)

(100.0)

200-300

25954

22085

3869

24665

19506

46266

161206

 

(16.1)

(13.7)

(2.4)

(15.3)

(12.1)

(28.7)

(100.0)

300-450

20976

17561

3415

17317

14146

34999

121948

 

(17.2)

(14.4)

(2.8)

(14.2)

(11.6)

(28.7)

(100.0)

450-800

23196

20049

3147

16785

12705

36135

116564

 

(19.9)

(17.2)

(2.7)

(14.4)

(10.9)

(31.0)

(100.0)

=>800

24582

21423

3159

11254

8688

32480

98723

 

(24.9)

(21.7)

(3.2)

(11.4)

(8.8)

(32.9)

(100.0)

Indebted

193492

151187

42305

229106

190816

391898

1478529

Hhs

(13.1)

(10.2)

(2.9)

(15.5)

(12.9)

(26.5)

(100.0)

Note: Figures in brackets are percentage to total households of respective

 

 Asset holding classes. Total will not tally due to rounding off and not reported

Source: NSSO (2005), AIDIS, Report No. 501.

 

 

 

 

Table 12, presents the distribution of cash debt classified by different asset holding classes for different purposes. First, the proportion of debt meant for farm business increased steadily with the increase in the size of household assets.  Second, interestingly, the proportion of debt for non-farm business remains generally uniform at around 12 per cent irrespective of the size of household assets.  Finally, the proportions spent on household expenditure declined with the increase in household assets, thus showing, as stated above, an increasing relationship between utilization of household debt and asset size.

 

Table 12: Estimated Cash Debt By Purpose

Asset

Productive

Farm

Non-Farm

Non-

Household

Total

Holding

Purpose

 

 

Productive

Expendi-

Expenditure

Class (000)

 

 

 

Purpose

ture

 

Rural Households in Rs.crore

0-15

37654

16664

20990

122255

108796

160230

 

(23.5)

(10.4)

(13.1)

(76.3)

(67.9)

(100.0)

15-30

100332

44806

55526

174275

149536

274882

 

(36.5)

(16.3)

(20.2)

(63.4)

(54.4)

(100.0)

30-60

211405

128771

82634

477211

384936

688616

 

(30.7)

(18.7)

(12.0)

(69.3)

(55.9)

(100.0)

60-100

320757

227784

92973

608044

500195

929731

 

(34.5)

(24.5)

(10.0)

(65.4)

(53.8)

(100.0)

100-150

402744

289744

113000

562103

448137

965813

 

(41.7)

(30.0)

(11.7)

(58.2)

(46.4)

(100.0)

150-200

322656

251117

71539

406604

338715

729990

 

(44.2)

(34.4)

(9.8)

(55.7)

(46.4)

(100.0)

200-300

531365

406204

125161

606461

426684

1137825

 

(46.7)

(35.7)

(11.0)

(53.3)

(37.5)

(100.0)

300-450

596242

466415

129827

605859

478436

1202101

 

(49.6)

(38.8)

(10.8)

(50.4)

(39.8)

(100.0)

450-800

1011362

787983

223379

745770

450276

1758891

 

(57.5)

(44.8)

(12.7)

(42.4)

(25.6)

(100.0)

=>800

2365168

1946233

418935

923636

613558

3298700

 

(71.7)

(59.0)

(12.7)

(28.0)

(18.6)

(100.0)

Total

5899870

4566779

1333091

5233720

3897698

11146778

 

(52.9)

(41.0)

(12.0)

(47.0)

(35.0)

(100.0)

Note: Figures in brackets are percentage to total households of respective

 Occupational categories. Total will not tally due to rounding off and not reported

Source: NSSO (2005), AIDIS, Report No. 501.

 

 

 

Urban Households

Tables 13 and 14 present the distribution pattern of urban households according to their assets size and purpose of cash debt as also the amount of debt for different purposes. 

 

It can be seen from the tables, that in 2002 more than 65 per cent of urban households debt is for non-productive purposes and that too on household expenditure. But the share declined with increasing size class. And the dictum that poorer the households borrow more for household expenditure is prominent in urban areas. Households  with the smallest asset holding class utilizing about 85 per cent of their total borrowings on non-productive purposes and in particular on household expenditure to the extent of  75 per cent of their outstanding debt.

 

Table 13: Estimated Number of Households – Purpose of Debt and Asset Holding Class (AHC)

AHC

Productive

Farm

Non-Farm

Non-

Household

Total

All

 

Purpose

 

 

Productive

Expendi-

Indebted

Households

 (Rs. ‘000)

 

 

 

Purpose

ture

Households

 

Urban Households in '00

0-15

832

92

740

9156

8231

9896

92485

 

(0.9)

(0.1)

(0.8)

(9.9)

(8.9)

(10.7)

(100.0)

15-30

669

141

528

4678

4326

5205

35170

 

(1.9)

(0.4)

(1.5)

(13.3)

(12.3)

(14.8)

(100.0)

30-60

1300

200

1100

6402

5501

7402

50013

 

(2.6)

(0.4)

(2.2)

(12.8)

(11.0)

(14.8)

(100.0)

60-100

1798

370

1428

8041

6877

9681

52903

 

(3.4)

(0.7)

(2.7)

(15.2)

(13.0)

(18.3)

(100.0)

100-150

1955

401

1554

8121

6868

9876

50132

 

(3.9)

(0.8)

(3.1)

(16.2)

(13.7)

(19.7)

(100.0)

150-200

1458

347

1111

5694

5000

6944

34721

 

(4.2)

(1.0)

(3.2)

(16.4)

(14.4)

(20.0)

(100.0)

200-300

2106

474

1632

8582

7371

10478

52652

 

(4.0)

(0.9)

(3.1)

(16.3)

(14.0)

(19.9)

(100.0)

300-450

1950

618

1332

7230

5945

8894

47563

 

(4.1)

(1.3)

(2.8)

(15.2)

(12.5)

(18.7)

(100.0)

450-800

3260

861

2399

10950

8428

13841

61516

 

(5.3)

(1.4)

(3.9)

(17.8)

(13.7)

(22.5)

(100.0)

=>800

4358

1323

3035

12840

10350

16653

77820

 

(5.6)

(1.7)

(3.9)

(16.5)

(13.3)

(21.4)

(100.0)

All

19767

4871

14896

81592

68945

98870

554976

 

(3.6)

(0.9)

(2.7)

(14.7)

(12.4)

(17.8)

(100.0)

Note: Figures in brackets are percentage to total households of respective

 

 Occupational categories. Total will not tally due to rounding off and not reported

Source: NSSO (2005), AIDIS, Report No. 501.

 

 

 

 

Table 14: Estimated Debt By Purpose

Asset

Productive

Farm

Non-Farm

Non-

Household

Total

Holding

Purpose

 

 

Productive

Expendi-

Expenditure

Class (000)

 

 

 

Purpose

ture

 

Urban Households in Rs.crore

0-15

20635

2987

17648

114980

102084

135750

 

(15.2)

(2.2)

(13.0)

(84.7)

(75.2)

(100.0)

15-30

27337

5443

21894

93744

83704

120960

 

(22.6)

(4.5)

(18.1)

(77.5)

(69.2)

(100.0)

30-60

32551

2942

29609

151354

120090

183905

 

(17.7)

(1.6)

(16.1)

(82.3)

(65.3)

(100.0)

60-100

55072

6301

48771

178514

149579

233352

 

(23.6)

(2.7)

(20.9)

(76.5)

(64.1)

(100.0)

100-150

60539

9133

51406

200146

160221

260946

 

(23.2)

(3.5)

(19.7)

(76.7)

(61.4)

(100.0)

150-200

34731

7515

27216

167561

139329

203104

 

(17.1)

(3.7)

(13.4)

(82.5)

(68.6)

(100.0)

200-300

86415

20575

65840

370805

291706

457219

 

(18.9)

(4.5)

(14.4)

(81.1)

(63.8)

(100.0)

300-450

91705

29514

62191

435337

310955

527042

 

(17.4)

(5.6)

(11.8)

(82.6)

(59.0)

(100.0)

450-800

194010

38065

155945

1032677

746572

1227915

 

(15.8)

(3.1)

(12.7)

(84.1)

(60.8)

(100.0)

=>800

1021572

216408

805164

2160894

1648517

3182465

 

(32.1)

(6.8)

(25.3)

(67.9)

(51.8)

(100.0)

Total

1624388

337248

1287140

4905262

3753671

6532656

 

(24.9)

(5.2)

(19.7)

(75.1)

(57.5)

(100.0)

Note: Figures in brackets are percentage to total households of respective

 Occupational categories. Total will not tally due to rounding off and not reported

Source: NSSO (2005), AIDIS, Report No. 501.

 

 

 

VIII

Utilization of Debt - Purpose –wise: A State-wise Analysis

Rural Households

State-wise distribution of households reporting debt according to the purpose of debt and the estimated amount of debt are given in statements 1 and 2.

 Among the states, 10 out of 20 states’ households invested their debt in productive purpose by more than the all-India average of 52.9 per cent. Among them, Jammu and Kashmir (76 per cent) and Chattisgarh (73.4 per cent), Madhya Pradesh (69.5 per cent), Maharashtra (69.5 per cent), were the four states which had reported about  70 per cent of their debt on productive purposes. Households in Kerala (31.9 per cent), Assam (34.8 per cent) and Tamil Nadu (38.7 per cent) were the three states who reported  the least amount for productive purposes ( Statement 1).

The households in Kerala topped the list in reporting debt for non-productive purposes at 68.1 per cent and that also 41.2 per cent on household expenditure. Households in Assam and Tamil Nadu follow Kerala for debt against non-productive purposes.

However, in rural areas of all states , some parts of their borrowing ranging from 30 per cent to 68 per cent has been meant for non productive purposes. Household Expenditure is top most  item of non-productive purpose expenditure in almost all states.

 

Urban Households

Household debt for non-productive purposes and that too for household expenditure, is the main purpose of utilizing the amount borrowed among urban households. More than 65 per cent of the debt was reported for non-productive purposes among all states except the households of Orissa  (59.9 per cent). This means productive purpose of debt  by urban households is very low (Statement 2).

*This note had been prepared by R.Krishnaswamy.

 

Highlights of  Current Economic Scene

AGRICULTURE  

 

The central government has withdrawn the ban on exports of superior non-basmati rice varieties (such as sharbati, swarna masuri, ponni and redmatta) and has permitted shipments that are priced above US $ 425 per tonne free on board (fob) on October 25, 2007. It is expected that with this move competing nations would have an upper hand in rice exports market.

Food Corporation of India (FCI) and State Agencies, have procured nearly 61.68 lakh tonnes of rice in the current marketing season till October 25, 2007 as against that of 67.71 lakh tonnes during the corresponding period of the 2006-07 marketing season. It is expected that if present trend holds, there would be possibility of fall in total purchases for the 2007-08 marketing season. Hence, central government is planning to pay additional bonus for paddy over and above the already announced minimum support price (MEP) of Rs 695 per quintal on common paddy and Rs 725 on grade A varieties for the marketing season (October- September) 2007-08.

The Food Ministry has asked the Food Corporation of India (FCI) to conduct random inspections at foodgrain godowns in those states where decentralised procurement are taking place. This procedure is going to undertake for ensuring the quality of food grain stored in them for the use of public distribution system (PDS).

The Solvent Extractor Association (SEA) has urged government to discourage the use of edible oil for the production of bio-fuel because prices of edible oils are rising by twofold in the domestic market and increasing usage of vegetable oil for non-food practice has made its supply falling short of its demand.

The National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd (Nafed) has changed its buying system; it would henceforth explore opportunities on daily basis to buy crude palm oil in the international market by entering into import contracts on a commercial basis. The purchase decisions would be undertaken on the basis of rates quoted and quantum of imports and may not be predetermined. It is also expected that government would not subsidise its commercial operations.

Nafed has planned to sell 20,000 tonnes of mustard seeds to local crushers to ease the shortage of edible oils. In addition to this, nearly 4lakh tonnes of oilseeds would be sold out from its stockpiles.

The National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Nabard) has decided that it would raise nearly Rs 4,000 crore by the end of the current financial year to refinance its short-term and long-term rural development projects. Until now it has sanctioned Rs 9,000 crore under long-term lending and Rs 18,000 crore for short-term lending projects. So far, bank has raised Rs 14,000 crore from the market at an average interest rate of 9.2 per cent, which is more than that of 8.9 per cent charged during last year. The interest expenditure for the quarter ended on September 30, 2007, went up to Rs 938.1 crore as against that of Rs 700.85 crore for the corresponding period last fiscal year, showing an increase of 33.85 per cent. The bank’s income from operations (after accounting for provision for loan assets) for the same period was Rs 1,364.53 crore as compared to that of Rs 1,106.91 crore last year. The gross surplus, before making provision for taxation, has stood at Rs 296.57 crore as on September 30, 2007, as compared with that of Rs 214.63 crore in the corresponding period in 2006 -07.

As per Spices Board, spices exports from the country during the period April –September 2007, has risen by 22 per cent in volume terms to 2,19,640 tonnes due to good demand for chilli and pepper in the international market; while in value terms exports have reported an increase of 29 per cent to Rs 2100 crore. India has exported nearly 1,00,000 tonnes of chilli in the first six months of 2007-08, that 72 per cent higher from a year ago, while in value terms they have increased to Rs 549 crore. Whereas pepper exports have surged by 37 per cent to 17000 tonnes on expectations of global shortage of the crop.

ITC has signed memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the government of Nagaland and the Spices Board for development of the naga chillies through the host of initiatives across the agricultural value chain. Under MOU ITC would develop spices crop in northeastern states introducing modern agricultural practices, crop development programme to improve quality and farm productivity, farm extension services, deployment of customized infrastructure and market development activities. This implementation would be carried out through associates like NGOs, which in turn would mobilise self-help groups (SHG) to collect the produce from the growers and undertake grading and primary processing. ITC would procure the spices produced under this programme and as the scale and scope of the project widen, domestic and export markets and value addition facilities to would be developed.

As per International Sugarcane Organisation, tight profit margins for the Indian sugarcane industry have raised cane prices, which have caused drop in the India’s sugar output. It is expected that sugarcane planting in November 2007 would decline by 20 per cent resulting in a fall of 5 million tonnes of sugarcane production within next two years. In spite of this, it is perceived that country’s sugar exports would rise to 5 million tonnes next season due to large inventories.

Company-wise Cane Arrears

(Rs Crore)

Companies

Cane Arrears

 Bajaj Hindusthan

330.94

 Balrampur Chini

120.5

 K. K. Birla

91.12

 Dhampur Sugar

80.78

 Triveni Engineering

73.76

 Mawana Sugars

41.36

 Simbhaoli Sugars

36.18

 DCM Shriram

22.43

 Dalmia Cement

7.96

Source: Media

According to the latest data by the Cane’s Commissioner Office at Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh), sugar mills in Uttar Pradesh has owed farmers a huge amount of Rs 1,460.21 crore as arrears towards cane payments during 2006-07 crushing season (October-September). It is affirmed that sugar mills bought Rs 11,010.82 crore worth of canes in the crushing season, against which payments are made of Rs 9,550.61 crore as on October 18, which leaves due of Rs 1,460.21 crore or 13.26 per cent of the total amount payable. Out of Rs 1,460.21 crore arrears, private mills owe Rs 1,122.11 crore (12.34 per cent), with the corresponding figures being Rs 183.06 crore (14.01 per cent) and Rs 155.04 crore (25.30 per cent) for cooperatives and state government-owned factories, respectively. Among individual companies/groups, the larger defaulter is Bajaj Hindusthan. Its payable dues have amounted to sum of Rs 1,870.74 crore and it has so far disbursed Rs 1,539.80 crore, which translates into arrears of Rs 330.94 crore or 17.69 per cent.

As per Cashew Export Promotion Council of India, cashew exporters have been upset due to cut down of Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) rate for cashew exports from 3 per cent to 1.5 per cent by central government. This decline in the DEPB rate is expected to affect cashew exports adversely, which have already suffered due to appreciation of rupee against the US dollar and stiff competition from Vietnam.

According to Rubber Board, synthetic rubber production in April- July 2007-08 has fallen down by about 5.7 per cent i.e., to 32,748 tonnes as compared with 34,739 tonnes a year ago, while consumption has risen by 8.2 per cent to 93,715 tonnes from 86,000 tonnes in the same period due to higher demand from auto tyre makers.

According to the projection by rubber traders, total natural rubber imports are poised to touch an all time high level in the current financial year with as much as 7,000-7,500 tonnes arriving on a monthly average. It is described that total imports would cross 90,000 tonnes on all time high in the 2007-08. Total imports have stood at 48,849 tonnes as on October 23, 2007 and may cross 50,000 tonnes by the end of this month. Currently the international prices of benchmark grade RSS-3 is lower by Rs 6-7 per kg forcing industries to go for imports.

The Coir Board has introduced Coir Board Workers Group Insurance Scheme in Kerala, under which it would provide insurance at the event of death and permanent disability. Where as unorganised workers would be covered under welfare schemes such as ESI so that they can get the benefit of hospitalisation and medicines. It is also suggested that all those who are registered with the Kerala Workers Welfare Fund Act would be given the protection of coverage under ESI on production of registration documents with the Welfare Board.

The US life science Monsanto has signed an agreement with the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University for a royalty free transfer of ring spot virus (RSV) resistance technology in papaya i.e. it would involve transfer of a virus coat protein gene to the papaya. This pact was signed because country produces nearly 25 lakh tonnes of papaya annually and RSV pest infects the crop at all stages of growth.

 

Inflation

The annual point-to-point inflation rate based on wholesale price index (WPI) declined to 3.07 percent for the week ended September 22,2007. During the comparable week of the earlier year, it was 5.36 per cent.

 

During the week under review, the WPI declined by 0.2 per cent to 214.7 from 215.1 at the previous weeks’ level (Base: 1993-94=100). The index of ‘primary articles’ group, (weight 22.02 per cent), dipped  by 0.8 percent to 224.7 from its previous week’s level of 226.4, mainly due to lower prices of fruits and vegetables, bajra, amize, moong, eggs and fish and raw cotton raw rubber some oil seeds.

 

Marginal rise in the index of  ‘fuel, power, light and lubricants’ group (weight 14.23 per cent) was witnessed due to aviation fuel price increase.

 

The index of ‘manufactured products’ group (weight 63.75 per cent) dipped  by 0.1 per cent to 187.2 from 187.4 for the previous week due to decline in the prices of gur, oilcakes cotton yarn etc.

 

The latest final index of WPI for the week ended August 11,2007 has undergone upward revision; as a result, both the absolute index and the implied inflation rate stood at 213.7 and 4.24 per cent as against the provisional data of 213.4 and 4.10 per cent.

Banking

 

IDBI Bank has posted 12 per cent increase in net profit at Rs 156 crore in the quarter ended September 2007 as against Rs 139 crore in the corresponding period last year, owing to a robust growth in non-interest income.

 

ICICI Bank has reported 33 per cent increase in net profit in the quarter ended September 30, 2007, driven by growth in net interest income. The bank’s net profit, for the first time, was in four digits at Rs 1,003 crore. Total income has risen by 41 per cent to Rs 9588 crore against Rs 6797 crore from a year ago.

 

Backed by robust growth in sale of investments and commissions, SBI has posted a 36 per cent growth in its net profit in the second quarter of the financial year. Profit rose to Rs 1611 crore compared with Rs 1184 crore in the same quarter last year.

 

Despite the law ministry clearance for investing forex reserves in the overseas subsidiary of India Infrastructure Finance Company (IIFCL), which is meant to provide easy funding access to domestic infrastructure companies, the RBI has rejected the proposal, announced by the finance minister in his Budget speech. Retreating its earlier review, the RBI, in a letter to the finance ministry, has said while refinancing loans by the IIFCL’s overseas subsidiary is feasible and can be implemented with ease, buying its securities is against its current policy. The RBI has suggested that the subsidiary should borrow from the market, which the bank will refinance.

 

The RBI will be the regulatory authority for currency futures trading, the draft guidelines for which will be issued soon by the central bank.

 

Buoyed by high growth in loans and a significant reduction in non-performing assets (NPAs), LIC Housing Finance has registered an increase of 53 per cent in its net profit to Rs 116.4 crore in the second quarter of 2007-08 from Rs 76 crore a year earlier.

 

The RBI has decided against the introduction of differentiated bank licensing system, which would have allowed the banks to operate in niche areas without having to follow priority sector and other regulatory stipulations. To enable the banking system to operate at optimum levels and in the interest of financial inclusion, it is essential that all banks should offer certain minimum services to all customers, while they are allowed sufficient freedom to function according to their own business models.

 

Financial Sector

 

Capital Market

Primary Market

Mundra Port SEZ Ltd, promoted by the Gujarat-based Adani group, is seeking to raise up to Rs 1,771 crore for development of its infrastructural facilities at Mundra and Dahej through IPO. The issue will open on November 1 and close on November 7. The price band has been fixed at Rs 400 and Rs 440 per equity share. The issue comprises a net issue of 40,100,000 equity shares to the public and a reservation of 1,50,000 shares for eligible employees.. MPSEZ is the largest port-based SEZ project in the country and the first such public issue to hit the capital market.

 

Religare Enterprises Ltd, a financial services company, will be foraying into the capital markets with an IPO of 75,76,102 equity shares of Rs 10 each for cash, at a price to be decided through a 100 per cent book-building process. The price band is fixed between Rs 160 and Rs 185 per equity share. The issue will open on October 29 and close on November 1.

 

Barak Valley Cements Ltd, a cement manufacturer in the north-east region, is to enter the capital market with an initial public offering of 56.60 lakh equity shares of face value Rs 10 each. The issue, which is being made through a 100 per cent book building process, opens on October 29, 2007 and closes on November 1, 2007. The price band has been fixed at Rs 37-Rs 42. Of the total issue, 1.13 lakh shares have been reserved for permanent employees on a competitive basis; therefore, the net issue to the public is 55.47 lakh shares. The net issue will constitute 25.03 per cent of the post issue paid-up capital of the company. The equity shares are proposed to be listed on BSE and NSE.

 

Secondary Market   

The market roared back into the black as it absorbed the impact of Sebi's clarifications on the participatory notes issue. The BSE sensex was up 9.59 at 19,243 points, hitting a new all-time high while the Nifty gained 9.34 per cent and shot up to 5702.3 points. The week witnessed a strong recovery and reacted positively to Sebi’s policy on Participatory Notes. Also, good quarterly results of some of the BSE sensex stocks such as L&T boosted sentiments. There was buying across sectors and companies with capital goods index gaining 20 per cent over the week. Among major gainers, L&T spurt by 28.2 per cent followed by Reliance Energy 25.3 per cent and SBI 25 per cent. 

 

All the BSE Sectoral indices rosed over the week except BSE-IT, which lost ground due to weak dollar outlook. Among other indices BSE- Capital goods gained the highest of 20.16 per cent followed by the BSE Bankex 16.25 per cent, BSE Metal 15.64 per cent, BSE-PSU 12.38 per cent and BSE-Reality 10.68 per cent    

 

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has cleared the proposal for a separate stock market for listing Small and Medium Companies (SMEs), which had been announced by the Sebi Chairman Mr M. Damodaran after the Sebi Board meeting on 25 October 2007. Sebi would select one entity, which would satisfy its eligibility criteria, and there is no proposal for revamp of the Over The Counter Exchange of India (OTCEI).

 

On 22 October 2007 Ashco Industries Ltd, a company dealing with analytical instrumentation, made its debut on the NSE at a premium of 5 per cent against the issue price of Rs 40. It opened at Rs 40, closed at Rs 44.75, doing a total trading of 474931 shares and made a turnover of Rs 216.28 lakh.

 

Construction and infrastructure development company, Maytas Infrastructure Ltd, made its debut on the BSE at a premium of 29.7 per cent at Rs 480 against the issue price of Rs 370, whereas on the NSE it has been listed at a premium of 39.39 per cent at Rs 515.75. The total shares traded on the BSE and the NSE are 72,90,850 shares and 1,35,08,756 shares respectively.

 

The clarifications issued by Sebi after its board meeting on Thursday October 25,2007 has removed most of the doubts and concerns that arose after the issue of the draft discussion paper on offshore derivative instruments in the week under review. The Sebi board has approved the proposal to ban the FIIs and their sub-accounts from issuing or renewing participatory notes (PNs) with derivatives as underlying. There would be no immediate impact of this move on the markets since the regulator has allowed 18 months for the unwinding of the existing positions. The PN holders can unwind their positions at the appropriate time over the next year and a half.  The Chairman, Mr Damodaran, has also clarified that FIIs who have issued PNs in excess of 40 per cent of the assets under custody need not bring down this limit to 40 per cent. They can issue fresh PNs against cancellation or redemption of the existing PNs.

 

Derivatives 

The spot Nifty closed at 5702 while the November contract was settled at 5712 with the December contract settled at 5699 and January at 5684. There is already five-digit open interest in December and January, and nearly three crore open interest is in November despite some 8.6 lakh contracts being extinguished. In the Nifty Junior, the November contract was settled at 10260 while the spot closed at 10268. In the Bank Nifty, the November contract was settled at 8763 while the spot closed at 8750.  In the CNX IT, the spot contract closed at 4825 while the November contract was settled at 4816.  Apart from the Nifty, all the other index futures lack liquidity except in the November contract. The CNX IT was the only market index to lose ground.

         

Government Securities Market           

Primary Market

On October 24, 2007, RBI auctioned 91-day and 364-day T-bills for the notified amounts of Rs.3,500 crore (out of which Rs.3,000 crore under MSS) and Rs.3,000 crore (out of which Rs.2,000 crore under MSS), respectively. The cut-off yields for 91-day and 364-day T-bills were 7.02 per cent and 7.36 per cent respectively.  

 

Through a price based auction method, the RBI re-issued 7.27 per cent 2013 and 8.35 per cent 2022 for Rs.4,000 crore each on October 26, 2007. . The cut-off yields were 7.74 per cent and 8.14 per cent respectively.  

 

RBI will re-issue 3 year maturing paper of 5.87 per cent 2010 and 11.30 per cent 2010 for Rs.5,000 each, through a price based auction using multiple price method. RBI will conduct both the auctions on 01 November 2007 under the Market Stabilisation Scheme (MSS). 

 

Secondary Market

Comfortable liquidity prevailing in the economy kept the call rates stable through out the week around 6.00-6.10 per cent. Gilts tracked the US markets wherein the weak economic data affirmed the expectations that the US Fed would cuts its benchmark rate in the impending FOMC meeting. Besides, the lower than expected size of MSS auctions coupled with expectation that the RBI in its upcoming mid-term review of credit policy would effect a rate cut buoyed the market sentiments. The yield on 10-year benchmark eased from 7.90 per cent in previous week to 7.82 per cent. 

 

 

Bond Market

During the week under review, Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Ltd tapped the market by issuing 3-year bonds by offering 9.35 per for an amount of Rs 117 crore. Icra and Fitch have rated the issue AAA

 

Foreign Exchange Market

The rupee gained 44 paise in the week , rallying from 40-level to a close to 39.45.This was supported by weakening dollar and fading political concerns. Also, improved flows outlook following the Sebi clarification improved the market sentiments. However, the exchange rate remained impervious of the surge in international crude oil prices. Forward premia rose sharply and 6 month annualized levels ended at 1.16 per cent against 0.6 per cent.

 

Commodities Futures derivatives

State-run firm MMTC and brokerage house Indiabulls, plan to set up a national-level commodity exchange may find it difficult to get regulatory nod in the absence of specific guidelines for this purpose.  MMTC and Indiabulls Financial Services plan to set up a special purpose vehicle (SPV) for the exchange, with the public sector firm holding a minority stake of 26 per cent.  According to MMTC Chairman and Managing director Sanjeev Batra they have already applied to the Forward Markets Commission for permission to set up a national level commodity bourse.

 

According to a senior official from an existing commodity exchange only the regulator can say whether there is any need for a fourth exchange at the national level or not.    This proposed exchange by Indiabulls and MMTC would be promoted by those who are already trading in futures market, while the other two leading exchanges like MCX and NCDEX do not have a conflict of interest.

 

 

Insurance

SBI Life Insurance company has registered a net profit of Rs 14 crore for the first half financial year 2007-08. The company has infused additional capital of Rs 100 crore, thereby taking the paid-up capital to Rs 600 crore.

 

Corporate Sector

Holcim, the world’s second largest cement maker, has scaled up its shareholding in Ambuja Cements by 3.15 per cent to nearly 40 per cent for Rs 741 crore through open market operations. In a series block deals, the Swiss cement major purchased 4.8 crore shares, representing 3.15 per cent stake in the country’s third largest cement maker ACL, for an average cost of Rs 148.80 a piece.

 

Indian cements, the country’s 5th largest cement maker, has posted a robust 89.8 per cent increase in net profit at Rs 223 crore for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, against Rs 117 crore in the previous corresponding quarter. Net sales in this period grew by 72 per cent to Rs 890 crore as compared with Rs 516 crore last year. A substantial rise in sales volumes accompanied by strong domestic demand and improved realizations contributed to the cement maker’s improved numbers.

 

ONGC-Mittal Energy (OMEL), a joint venture between ONGC Videsh and LN-Mittal promoted Mittal Investment, has acquired a 30 per cent stake in an offshore exploration block in the Caspian Sea, Turkmenistan . 

 

L&T, the country’s largest engineering and construction company has decided to build two new ports at a combined cost of Rs 3,000 crore and its third shipyard in the country. The government has asked private companies to indicate interest in building a shipyard on the west and east coasts.

 

Infrastructure firm Hindustan Construction Company has received three orders in the transport and water sector worth Rs 983 crore.

 

Bharat Forge, the flagship company of the Kalyani Group, has reported increase of 9 per cent net profit to Rs 67.8 crore in the quarter ended September 2007, as compared to Rs 62 crore in the corresponding period last year.

 

 

Information Technology

The rupee’s appreciation against the dollar has claimed its first victim in the BPO space. US-based Spectrum Global Fund Administration (SGFA), providing back-office operations to hedge funds in the US and the UK , is closing its facilities in Bangalore by December end. The company had started its operations in India two years ago and has close to 100 employees. The centre serves about 60-70 clients of the total 110 in the hedge fund sector. The company cites increasing attrition and rising costs as reasons for closing the unit.

 

TCS is launching a new subsidiary TCS, South Africa , to expand its operations there.

 

Telecom

The total number of wireless subscribers in the country – including GSM, CDMA and fixed mobile – has reached 209.08 million and the tele-density stood at 21.85 per cent as on September 30 this year. The total telephone subscriber base stood at 248.66 million, much ahead of the target month of December. Keeping the growth projections on conservative scale, the subscriber number has already crossed 250 million. As a result, the 500 million target for 2010 can be achieved.

 

BSNL has announced an investment of Rs 60,000 crore in next three years to expand its GSM, broadband and WLL services, a move that would help the SPU achieve top positions by 2010.

 

  

Macroeconomic Indicators

Table 1 : Index Numbers of Industrial Production (1993-94 =100)

Table 2 : Production in Infrastructure Industries (Physical Output Series)

Table 3: Procurment, Offtake and Stock of foodgrains

Table 4: Index Numbers of  Wholesale Prices (1993-94 = 100)

Table 5 : Cost of Living Indices

Table 6 : Budgetary Position of Government of India

Table 7 : Government Borrowing Programmes and Performance

Table 8 : Scheduled Commercial Banks - Business in India  

Table 9 : Money Stock : components and Sources

Table 10 : Reserve Money : Components and Sources

Table 11 : Average Daily Turnover in Call Money Market

Table 12 : Assistance Sanctioned and Disbursed by All-India Financial Institutions

Table 13 : Capital Market

Table 14 : Foreign Trade

Table 15 : India's Overall Balance of Payments

Table 16 : Foreign Investment Inflows  
Table 17 : Foreign Collaboration Approvals (Route-Wise)
Table 18 : Year-Wise (Route-Wise) Actual Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI/NRI)

Table 19 : NRI Deposits - Outstandings

Table 20 : Foreign Exchange Reserves

Table 21 : Indices REER and NEER of the Indian Rupee

Table 22 : Turnover in Foreign Exchange Market  
Table 23 : India's Template on International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity [As reported under the IMFs special data dissemination standards (SDDS)
Table 24 : Settlement Volume and Netting Factor for Government Securities Transactions Settled at CCIL - Monthly, Quarterly and Annual Basis.
Table 25 : Inter-Catasegory Distribution of All Types of Trade in Government Securities Settled at CCIL (With Market Share in Respective Trade Types) 
Table 26 : Category-wise Market Share in Settlement Volume of Government Securities Transactions (in Per Cent)
Table 27 : Settlement Volume and Netting Factor for Total Forex Transactions Settled at CCIL - Monthly, Quarterly and Annual Basis.
Table 28 : Inter-Category Distribution of Total Foreign Exchange Transactions Settled at CCIL (With Market Share in Respective Trade Types) 

 

Memorandum Items

CSO's Quarterly Estimates of GDP  

GDP at Factor Cost by Economic Activity

India's Overall Balance of Payments  

*These statistics and the accompanying review are a product arising from the work undertaken under the joint ICICI research centre.org-EPWRF Data Base Project.

LIST OF WEEKLY THEMES


 

We will be grateful if you could kindly send us your feed back at epwrf@vsnl.com